2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2003.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sites in the fourth membrane-associated domain regulate alcohol sensitivity of the NMDA receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, we identified five positions in the GluN1 and GluN2A subunits that had not been previously shown to regulate ethanol sensitivity. Substitution mutations at a few of these individual positions, such as GluN2A(L824), had no effect on ethanol sensitivity by themselves (Honse et al, 2004) but influenced ethanol action only in concert with mutations at their paired position (Ren et al, 2012). In contrast, we found that tryptophan substitution at F636 in the M3 domain of GluN2A (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that study, we identified five positions in the GluN1 and GluN2A subunits that had not been previously shown to regulate ethanol sensitivity. Substitution mutations at a few of these individual positions, such as GluN2A(L824), had no effect on ethanol sensitivity by themselves (Honse et al, 2004) but influenced ethanol action only in concert with mutations at their paired position (Ren et al, 2012). In contrast, we found that tryptophan substitution at F636 in the M3 domain of GluN2A (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Reports from our laboratory and others have identified a small number of amino acid residues located in the M3 and M4 domains of NMDA receptor GluN1 and GluN2 subunits that influence ethanol sensitivity and channel function (Ronald et al, 2001;Ren et al, 2003bRen et al, , 2007Honse et al, 2004;Smothers and Woodward, 2006;Xu et al, 2012). The determinants of ethanol sensitivity and receptor function at each of these positions differ markedly from each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Data acquisition was conducted through the Clampex 9.2 program (Axon Instruments). Dose-response curves were generated from macroscopic peak currents (I) obtained from 7 different ACh concentrations (1,3,10,30,55,100, and 300 M ACh). Dose-response curves were fitted through the sigmoidal dose-response equation with variable slope using the GraphPad Prism 4 program (GraphPad),…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the enhanced synaptic function of non-NMDAR in activity-dependent or cocaine-induced synaptic plasticity (Hayashi et al, 2000;Ungless et al, 2001), the rare inhibition of CeA non-NMDAR by alcohol may indicate a critical role of CeA non-NMDAR in alcohol reward and addiction. Alcohol inhibits NMDAR functions likely by allosteric modulation of the channel gating (Wright et al, 1996;Woodward, 2000;Honse et al, 2004;Smothers and Woodward, 2006). The molecular mechanisms involved in alcohol inhibition of postsynaptic non-NMDAR remain largely unknown at present.…”
Section: Acute Alcohol-induced Inhibition Of Glutamate Receptor Functmentioning
confidence: 99%