2005
DOI: 10.1021/bi0516024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Specificity of Agonist-Induced Opening and Desensitization of theTorpedocalifornicaNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

Abstract: Agonist-binding kinetics to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) from Torpedo californica were measured using sequential-mixing stopped-flow fluorescence methods to determine the contribution of each individual site to agonist-induced opening and desensitization. Timed dansyl-C6-choline (DC6C) binding followed by its dissociation upon mixing with high, competing agonist concentrations revealed four kinetic components: an initial, fast fluorescence decay, followed by a transient increase, and then two ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept was extended to suggest that each agonist-binding subunit pair also has only one desensitized structure, and that fast and slow desensitization differ merely in the number of desensitized pairs (Prince and Sine, 1999). Rapid kinetics studies with a fluorescent agonist provide supporting evidence that the αδ agonist site desensitizes more slowly than the αγ site (Andreeva et al, 2006; Song et al, 2003). Thus, αγ subunit pair rearrangement should accompany fast desensitization, while αδ rearrangement accompanies slow desensitization.…”
Section: Asymmetry and Allosteric Mechanisms In Hetero-oligomersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This concept was extended to suggest that each agonist-binding subunit pair also has only one desensitized structure, and that fast and slow desensitization differ merely in the number of desensitized pairs (Prince and Sine, 1999). Rapid kinetics studies with a fluorescent agonist provide supporting evidence that the αδ agonist site desensitizes more slowly than the αγ site (Andreeva et al, 2006; Song et al, 2003). Thus, αγ subunit pair rearrangement should accompany fast desensitization, while αδ rearrangement accompanies slow desensitization.…”
Section: Asymmetry and Allosteric Mechanisms In Hetero-oligomersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These transitions occur in at least three phases (21). A fast fluorescence change at 25-50 ms reflects agonist binding to the small population of receptors that already exist in the desensitized state ("predesensitized" nAChRs), and also includes a smaller component of binding to the ␣-␦ site in its resting state (47). This component is followed by intermediate (Ͻ1 s) and slow steps of desensitization, reflecting intermediate transitions of the nAChR as it desensitizes.…”
Section: The Functional Interaction Between the Nachr And The Nak-atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), 3 thereby excluding possible nonspecific effects of ouabain. In addition, the amplitude of the initial rapid phase, which reflects the initial equilibrium between predesensitized and resting states (47), is unaltered. Thus, ouabain does not alter the intrinsic equilibrium between resting and desensitized states in the absence of nicotinic agonist.…”
Section: The Functional Interaction Between the Nachr And The Nak-atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adult AChRs, the α−δ and α−e sites are equal and independent insofar as each has the same affinity for ACh and supplies the same amount of binding energy for gating (10). In fetal AChRs, the two binding sites are asymmetric with regard to agonist affinity, with estimates for the ratio of resting equilibrium dissociation constants for ACh ranging from ∼5- (11,12) to >100-fold (13,14). γ-AChRs also have a longer open channel lifetime, a smaller unitary conductance, and a lower Ca 2+ permeability than e-AChRs (15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%