2018
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-Specifically Initiated Controlled/Living Branching Radical Polymerization: A Synthetic Route toward Hierarchically Branched Architectures

Abstract: Controlled/living radical polymerization was developed to synthesize branched polyacrylates and polystyrene with tunable degrees of branching and low dispersities. This method is based on a polymerization-induced branching process that occurs when n-butyl α-bromoacrylate is copolymerized under atom transfer radical polymerization conditions. This novel branching polymerization demonstrates excellent synthetic versatility, enabling the preparation of complex macromolecular architectures constructed from branche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modification strategy is highly tunable in types of functional groups, and multiple components are straightforwardly incorporated by virtue of delicate combination of widely used organic reactions (e.g., esterification, substitution and "click" reactions) [125][126][127][128] and controlled radical polymerization techniques (e.g., atom transfer radical polymerization, ATRP, or reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer, RAFT). [129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141] Therefore, the pore surface chemistry can be subsequently changed, and pore size control is also attainable. For example, meticulous redox-active energetic COF were designed via "click" functionalization on the porous skeleton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modification strategy is highly tunable in types of functional groups, and multiple components are straightforwardly incorporated by virtue of delicate combination of widely used organic reactions (e.g., esterification, substitution and "click" reactions) [125][126][127][128] and controlled radical polymerization techniques (e.g., atom transfer radical polymerization, ATRP, or reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer, RAFT). [129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141] Therefore, the pore surface chemistry can be subsequently changed, and pore size control is also attainable. For example, meticulous redox-active energetic COF were designed via "click" functionalization on the porous skeleton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these highly branched polymers, hyperbranched polymers receive particular interest from both industries and academia because of their one‐pot inexpensive synthesis and retention of arborescent structures. Hyperbranched polymers typically could be produced in one pot via step‐growth polymerization of multifunctional AB m (m ≥ 2) monomers, [ 7–13 ] step‐growth copolymerization of A n and B m monomers (e.g., A 2 + B 3 ), [ 14–16 ] chain‐growth polymerization of AB m (m ≥ 2) monomers, [ 17–19 ] chain‐growth copolymerization of divinyl cross‐linkers, [ 20–26 ] self‐condensing vinyl polymerization (SCVP) of polymerizable initiators (inimers), [ 27–35 ] or polymerizable transfer agents (transmers). [ 36–40 ] It is important to note that any of these methods could produce hyperbranched polymers and randomly branched polymer as their difference lies in the fraction of branching unit incorporated into the polymer backbone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] While linear polymers can be precisely synthesized by RDRP, the preparation of branched polymers [5] exhibits increased difficulty. Recently, the Zhong [6] and Yamago [7] groups reported chain-growth branching polymerization via Cu-and Te-mediated processes, respectively, enabling controlled synthesis of well-defined polystyrene and polyacrylate under thermal conditions. Due to the unselective chemical reactivity between monomer and the dormant C À X bond (e.g., X = Br) in the presence/absence of catalyst, it is challenging for previous RDRP methods to provide different topologies from similar formulations of starting materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%