Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s164542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific PEGylation of an anti-CEA/CD3 bispecific antibody improves its antitumor efficacy

Abstract: IntroductionBispecific antibodies that engage immune cells to kill cancer cells are actively pursued in cancer immunotherapy. Different types of bispecific antibodies, including single-chain fragments, Fab fragments, nanobodies, and immunoglobulin Gs (IgGs), have been studied. However, the low molecular weight of bispecific antibodies with single-chain or Fab fragments generally leads to their rapid clearance in vivo, which limits the therapeutic potential of these bispecific antibodies.Materials and methodsIn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these is extending the serum half-life of the nanobody using different formatting options. Examples hereof are fusion of the nanobody directly with albumin, polyethylene glycol (PEG; PEGylation) or IgG-Fc (allowing recycling through the neonatal Fc receptor [FcR]), or indirectly with a second nanobody that binds albumin or the neonatal FcR, thereby generating bispecific constructs 39-42. Another option to obtain maximal delivery in the tumor site is to use a gene therapy approach, which could be highly feasible for nanobodies as these are simple proteins expressed from one single gene 43,44.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Nanobodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these is extending the serum half-life of the nanobody using different formatting options. Examples hereof are fusion of the nanobody directly with albumin, polyethylene glycol (PEG; PEGylation) or IgG-Fc (allowing recycling through the neonatal Fc receptor [FcR]), or indirectly with a second nanobody that binds albumin or the neonatal FcR, thereby generating bispecific constructs 39-42. Another option to obtain maximal delivery in the tumor site is to use a gene therapy approach, which could be highly feasible for nanobodies as these are simple proteins expressed from one single gene 43,44.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Nanobodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The serum samples were collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h post-injection for bioanalytical measurement. Antibody concentrations in serum were determined by the ELISA method, as described previously 45 . PK analyses were performed according to standard non-compartmental analysis using Kinetica (version [v.]5.1 SP1, Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al ( 96 ) created a BiTE composed of an anti-CEA nanobody and anti-CD3 Fab (“S-Fab”), with significant T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo . The S-Fab was PEGylated to extend its serum half-life and reported uncompromised anti-tumor activity ( 97 ). Various advancements have also been made in targeting CD3 ( 98 ), and anti-CD3 nanobodies have recently reported a targeted anti-tumor response in vivo ( 93 , 99 ).…”
Section: Nanobodies: Synergy With Other Cancer Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%