2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site specific optimization of wind turbines energy cost: Iterative approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other instances indirectly as a measure of improvement, the LCoE is employed as the objective function of optimization problems concerning layouts or structural designs. In [7] individual turbines and wind farms are constructively optimized on the basis of reducing the final LCoE. Similarly in [8] the LCoE is employed as the objective function of a bi-level programming approach to also optimize the constructive layout.. And in the particular case of wind energy production-the subject of this paper-Farrell and colleagues' paper offers a thorough review of LCoE estimates existing in the literature [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In other instances indirectly as a measure of improvement, the LCoE is employed as the objective function of optimization problems concerning layouts or structural designs. In [7] individual turbines and wind farms are constructively optimized on the basis of reducing the final LCoE. Similarly in [8] the LCoE is employed as the objective function of a bi-level programming approach to also optimize the constructive layout.. And in the particular case of wind energy production-the subject of this paper-Farrell and colleagues' paper offers a thorough review of LCoE estimates existing in the literature [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rehman et al [8] presumed OHH to be an intersection where the total cost function of HH and a gradient curve of the AEP function were crossed, but they did not present sufficient rationale that the calculated intersection was theoretically OHH, rather they applied their own method to regions with a few observation data. Maki et al [9] and Mirghaed et al [10] calculated the minimized COE iteratively with regard to all cases by controlling a variety of variables, including generator's revolutions per minute (RPM) and turbine pitch, in addition to HH and RD. This was not only complicated, but also incurred high calculation cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference [22], the authors presented a framework for the site-specific design optimization of a horizontal-axis onshore wind turbine, in which the blade number, rotor diameter, tower height, rotor rotational speed, rated wind speed, and rated power were optimized to match the wind condition described by the Weibull distribution and parameters. Mirghaed et al [23] developed an iterative approach to optimize a single turbine with minimum COE, in which the capital cost was a function of all turbine components, such as rotor diameter, hub height and rated power. In the study, it was found that the onshore turbines with capacities of about 1-2 MW lowered their COE by about 45-75 $/MWh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%