2022
DOI: 10.1177/02683555221088103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific mechanical properties of the human great saphenous vein: Cadaveric comparisons among the thigh, knee, and lower leg harvest sites

Abstract: Background This study aimed to determine site-specific mechanical properties of the great saphenous vein (GSV) harvested from various sites in the same cadaver. Methods GSV samples were harvested from three sites: the thigh, knee, and lower leg. The thickness and diameter of the samples were measured, and the tensile test was performed to measure stiffness and Young’s modulus. Results The stiffness of the GSV harvested from knees in the longitudinal direction was lower than those from other sites, whereas the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are literature data which claim that the thickness of the GSV wall may increases with age, and it could be also slightly influenced by patient's gender [12,13]. Although this study included patients a wide range of ages, and the groups were made up of patients of both sexes, we did not identify statistically significant correlations between these parameters, the thickness of the venous wall, or the total diameter of the vessel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…There are literature data which claim that the thickness of the GSV wall may increases with age, and it could be also slightly influenced by patient's gender [12,13]. Although this study included patients a wide range of ages, and the groups were made up of patients of both sexes, we did not identify statistically significant correlations between these parameters, the thickness of the venous wall, or the total diameter of the vessel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%