2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific factors in the production of local urban ecosystem services: A case study of community-managed green space

Abstract: 1 Site-specific factors in the production of local urban ecosystem services: a case study of community-managed green space. AbstractPockets of green space in cities can provide important ecosystem services for urban residents. As naturalistic spaces in urban areas become increasingly sparse, communities are beginning to co-manage existing incidental pockets of land towards the creation of communal natural resources. Such green commons can be productive in terms of ecosystem services through targeted management… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban areas do not necessarily provide fewer ecosystem services compared to other regions, as urban green infrastructure, such as tree cover or peri-urban agriculture, can significantly contribute to support biodiversity and ecosystem service delivery (Dennis andJames 2016, Larondelle andHaase 2013). However, in this case, the high recreational ecosystem service flow in green urban areas appears to be unbalanced with the capacity of these spaces to deliver these services given the relatively low number of caches in these environments.…”
Section: Evidence-based Management Of Urban Recreational Ecosystem Sementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Urban areas do not necessarily provide fewer ecosystem services compared to other regions, as urban green infrastructure, such as tree cover or peri-urban agriculture, can significantly contribute to support biodiversity and ecosystem service delivery (Dennis andJames 2016, Larondelle andHaase 2013). However, in this case, the high recreational ecosystem service flow in green urban areas appears to be unbalanced with the capacity of these spaces to deliver these services given the relatively low number of caches in these environments.…”
Section: Evidence-based Management Of Urban Recreational Ecosystem Sementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Under the classification schemes of the UA and LCM, however, it is not possible to identify such sites as consisting of green and blue space at all. Such spaces provide important social [69][70][71] and ecological [71][72][73] benefits and present a pertinent example of how smaller but highly productive urban green spaces have hitherto been overlooked in urban mapping classification schemes. The ability to capture such spaces and their associated landscape features is a key improvement made possible through the mapping approach developed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a natural rainwater storage and purification facility, urban green space not only helps enhance the infiltration of runoff to supplements the groundwater [1][2][3] , but also reduces the speed of runoff. Besides, it can improve the removal efficiency of pollutants settlement and reduce the scour of soils by runoff [4][5] . Urban green space also plays a very important role in reducing the runoff peak flow [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%