2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site specific diel methane emission mechanisms in landfills: A field validated process based on vegetation and climate factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have looked at the impact of wind speed (Poulsen, 2005;Xin et al, 2016), wind direction (Xu et al, 2014) and solar radiation (Xin et al, 2016) on LFG emissions. Poulsen (2005) simulated LFG emissions at a Danish landfill and concluded that wind speed affects LFG emissions especially in winter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few studies have looked at the impact of wind speed (Poulsen, 2005;Xin et al, 2016), wind direction (Xu et al, 2014) and solar radiation (Xin et al, 2016) on LFG emissions. Poulsen (2005) simulated LFG emissions at a Danish landfill and concluded that wind speed affects LFG emissions especially in winter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poulsen (2005) simulated LFG emissions at a Danish landfill and concluded that wind speed affects LFG emissions especially in winter. Xin et al (2016) measured diel CH4 emissions, using flux chambers at a Chinese landfill, and observed that CH4 fluxes were affected highly by solar radiation during daytime and by wind speed at night. Xu et al (2014) measured CH4 emissions from a U.S. landfill, using the eddy covariance method, and found no influence of wind direction on the measured CH4 emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some advective mechanisms may be locally important for gas fluxes (SCHEUTZ et al, 2009). Inductive mechanisms of advective gas movement in the substrate may be: variations in atmospheric pressure (AGHDAM et al, 2019;FJELSTED et al, 2019;XU et al, 2014), temperature (CHRISTOPHERSEN et al, 2001;FENG et al, 2017;PARK;SHIN, 2001;UYANIK et al, 2012), wind velocity in the substrate surface (AGHDAM et al, 2019;XIN et al, 2016), substrate humidity and water percolation (HAN-SON; HANSON, 1996;BOGNER et al, 2008), and differences in substrate density (BIAN et al, 2018b;RACHOR et al, 2011). However, the results presented here show no variation in the fluxes, and no correlation between the variables analyzed and the gas emissions, despite the significant variation in temperature (Table 1).…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide and Methane Fluxes At Different Periods Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advective movement of gases through the substrate can be induced by variations on atmospheric pressure (AGHDAM et al, 2019;FJELSTED et al, 2019;XU et al, 2014), air temperature (ABICHOU et al, 2015;BOWDEN et al, 1998;XU et al, 2014), surface wind speed (AGHDAM et al, 2019;XIN et al, 2016), displacement of the water that infiltrates the substrate (ABICHOU et al, 2009;BAJAR et al, 2017;HANSON;HANSON, 1996;ROSLEV;KING, 1996;WHALEN et al, 1990), and differences in dump compaction KAUSHAL;SHARMA, 2016;RÖWER et al, 2011). CH 4 is less dense than the atmospheric air, and therefore tends to rise, while CO 2 and almost all of the vapors produced by volatile organic liquids are denser than air, tending to sink when released into the gaseous portion of the substrate (SEINFELD; PANDIS, 2006).…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide and Methane Fluxes In Three Locations And At mentioning
confidence: 99%