2020
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.12799787
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Selective C-H Functionalization of Mitragyna Alkaloids Reveals a Molecular Switch for Tuning Opioid Receptor Signaling Efficacy

Abstract: <p>Mitragynine is the most abundant alkaloid component of the psychoactive plant material “kratom”, which according to numerous anecdotal reports shows efficacy in self-medication for pain syndromes, depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders. We developed a new synthetic method for selective functionalization of the unexplored C11 position of the mitragynine scaffold (C6 position in indole numbering) via the use of an indole-ethylene glycol adduct and subsequent iridium-catalyzed borylation. We di… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti‐nociceptive effects of both mitragynine and 7‐OH mitragynine were abolished in μ receptor knockout mice, but not in mice lacking either the δ or the κ opioid receptors (Kruegel et al, 2019). The analgesic effects of kratom, together with the low rates of acute toxicity or overdose following its ingestion (Veltri & Grundmann, 2019), have attracted considerable attention in the search for novel, safer opioid‐based analgesics amid the current opioid crisis (Bhowmik et al, 2021; Chakraborty, Diberto, Faouzi, et al, 2021; Chakraborty, Uprety, Daibani, et al, 2021; Gutridge et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anti‐nociceptive effects of both mitragynine and 7‐OH mitragynine were abolished in μ receptor knockout mice, but not in mice lacking either the δ or the κ opioid receptors (Kruegel et al, 2019). The analgesic effects of kratom, together with the low rates of acute toxicity or overdose following its ingestion (Veltri & Grundmann, 2019), have attracted considerable attention in the search for novel, safer opioid‐based analgesics amid the current opioid crisis (Bhowmik et al, 2021; Chakraborty, Diberto, Faouzi, et al, 2021; Chakraborty, Uprety, Daibani, et al, 2021; Gutridge et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 In more recent that have revealed further insight into the molecular mechanisms of analgesia and opioid-induced side effects. [12][13][14]49 The results from this SAR study add to this tradition by providing new chemical scaffolds that can engage the µOR binding pocket in unique ways. To rationalize the SAR trends we observed, we used induced-fit docking (Maestro) to identify potential binding modes and interactions made between two of the more potent derivatives (19 and 33) and the µOR (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…15 Nitrile analog 10 was synthesized from 9 in a palladium-catalyzed cyanation with Zn(CN)2 as the nitrile source. 23 Suzuki-Miyaura cross-couplings were used to append aromatic and heterocyclic rings (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). 15 In addition to introducing substitutions at C10, reduction of 9 with formic acid as the hydride source provides 2.…”
Section: Aromatic Modifications (C10 and C11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DAMGO and fentanyl were excluded from this analysis because of their different chemical composition and expected unique mode of binding with respect to the other molecules in the data set. The MD simulations of SC1, SC3, SC4, SC11, SC12, SC13, 11F, 37,38 morphine, and buprenorphine (See Appendix 1-Table 5 for efficacy data), were carried out using the same simulation parameters and protocol used in our previous work on 7OH and mitragynine. 39 A statistical analysis of structural interaction fingerprints (SIFts) derived from these simulations and whose average probabilities are listed in Appendix 1-Table 6 for each ligand, yielded 8 statistical models that best recapitulate the negative logarithm of experimental G protein Emax values obtained for each ligand (see Appendix 1-Figure 4, Gi-1 Emax was used for ligands).…”
Section: Sc11-13 Form Different Interactions With Mor Compared To Morphine and Buprenorphinementioning
confidence: 99%