2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site selection for low and intermediate level radioactive waste disposal facility in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acceptance of Čerkezovac as the RWMC might speed up the process of acceptance of the same location for the construction of the near-surface disposal site, which would mean lower transportation costs and reduction of other expenses. Disposal at a different location after long-term storage at the Čerkezovac site, would allow a modern and acceptable way for the disposal site selection, as has been performed in other countries (Metlay, 2016;Yun, 2008). Certainly, more than just one potential location can be identified, and, after the voluntaristic approach is applied (Chapman & Hooper, 2012;Kojo & Richardson, 2014;Ramana, 2013;Stefanelli, Seidl, & Siegrist, 2017), there is a higher likelihood of acceptance of the possible location by the local community and the Croatian people in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptance of Čerkezovac as the RWMC might speed up the process of acceptance of the same location for the construction of the near-surface disposal site, which would mean lower transportation costs and reduction of other expenses. Disposal at a different location after long-term storage at the Čerkezovac site, would allow a modern and acceptable way for the disposal site selection, as has been performed in other countries (Metlay, 2016;Yun, 2008). Certainly, more than just one potential location can be identified, and, after the voluntaristic approach is applied (Chapman & Hooper, 2012;Kojo & Richardson, 2014;Ramana, 2013;Stefanelli, Seidl, & Siegrist, 2017), there is a higher likelihood of acceptance of the possible location by the local community and the Croatian people in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%