The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site selection decision of waste-to-energy projects based on an extended cloud-TODIM method from the perspective of low-carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extended cloud TODIM (Tomada de Decisão Iterativa Multicritério) method is proposed, which describes the evaluation information through a credible fuzzy language term set (HFLTS), and converts the fuzzy language term set into a cloud to fully describe the ambiguity, uncertainty, and randomness. Then, a combination of network analysis method (ANP) and entropy weight method is used to calculate the criterion weight [ 50 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extended cloud TODIM (Tomada de Decisão Iterativa Multicritério) method is proposed, which describes the evaluation information through a credible fuzzy language term set (HFLTS), and converts the fuzzy language term set into a cloud to fully describe the ambiguity, uncertainty, and randomness. Then, a combination of network analysis method (ANP) and entropy weight method is used to calculate the criterion weight [ 50 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However which has a significant impact on decision-making process (Gao et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2023). Therefore, it is essential to consider the psychological behavior of evaluators.…”
Section: Research Gaps and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the traditional WINGS has been further extended in this study by incorporating DTN and DTCN‐based IVFFSs logic, which offers superior benefits in managing uncertainty compared to trapezoidal fuzzy and interval‐valued intuitionistic fuzzy models. The traditional ranking methods, such as Multi‐Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC), Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHREE‐II), Multi‐Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA), Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS), IVFFSs Enhanced Data Authentication System (EDAS), Grey Relation Analysis (GRA), and IVFFSs Combinative Distance‐based Assessment (CODAS) are incompetent in handling the psychological behavior of decision makers which has a significant impact on decision‐making process (Gao et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2023). Therefore, it is essential to consider the psychological behavior of evaluators.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al [51] Solar energy Evaluation of solar farms locations in Morocco AHP Mensour et al [52] Waste-to-energy Selection of appropriate WtE technology considering both subjective perspective of decision-maker and objective evaluation of the actual performance metrics of each alternative Fuzzy-AHP, Fuzzy-Entropy and Fuzzy-Multi-Objective Optimisation Alao et al [53] Biomethane in the transport sector…”
Section: Ndc Domains Where Mcdm Have Been Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%