1966
DOI: 10.1210/endo-79-2-328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site of Action of Vasopressin in Causing Corticotropin Release1

Abstract: The corticotropin-releasing properties of lysine vasopressin and that of a porcine pituitary extract were compared by means of injections into hypothalamic sites or into the adenohypophysis of dexamethasone-pretreated rats of both sexes. In all cases the doses used for central injections were below the minimal dose capable of causing an increase in adrenal secretion of corticosterone after intravenous injection, so that corticotropin (ACTH-like) effects or contamination by ACTH could be excluded as a cause of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that hypothalami from Brattleboro rats are capable of secreting considerable amounts of CRF in vitro, in response to trophic stimuli, does not support the recent proposal (Gillies & Lowry, 1979) that vasopressin is identical with the corticotrophin releasing hormone and that it requires a synergistic factor to express its full biological activity. However, our results do not preclude the possibilities that vasopressin may either stimulate the release of CRF (Hedge, Yates, Marcus & Yates, 1966) or potentiate the action of CRF at the pituitary level (Yates et al 1971). Of these the latter is more feasible for, although vasopressin has no effect on the secretion of CRF by isolated hypothalami in vitro (Burden, Harrison, Hillhouse, Ironmonger & Jones, 1975), minute concentrations of vasopressin (Buckingham & Leach, 1979) and vasopressin related peptides (Buckingham & van Wimersma Greidanus, unpublished observations) potentiate the corticotrophin releasing activity of hypothalamic extracts.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Our finding that hypothalami from Brattleboro rats are capable of secreting considerable amounts of CRF in vitro, in response to trophic stimuli, does not support the recent proposal (Gillies & Lowry, 1979) that vasopressin is identical with the corticotrophin releasing hormone and that it requires a synergistic factor to express its full biological activity. However, our results do not preclude the possibilities that vasopressin may either stimulate the release of CRF (Hedge, Yates, Marcus & Yates, 1966) or potentiate the action of CRF at the pituitary level (Yates et al 1971). Of these the latter is more feasible for, although vasopressin has no effect on the secretion of CRF by isolated hypothalami in vitro (Burden, Harrison, Hillhouse, Ironmonger & Jones, 1975), minute concentrations of vasopressin (Buckingham & Leach, 1979) and vasopressin related peptides (Buckingham & van Wimersma Greidanus, unpublished observations) potentiate the corticotrophin releasing activity of hypothalamic extracts.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Even if this be the case, the possible maximal dose to be injected by our intrapituitary microinjection method would at best amount to approximately 4mU, as calculated back from the data of McCann and Haberland (1959) and Konig and Meyer (1967). As already reported (Hedge et al, 1966;Hiroshige et al, 1968a), this amount of vasopressin as well as oxytocin, when placed directly into the adenohypophysis, was proved quite ineffective in eliciting ACTH release. As to the biogenic amines present in the hypothalamus, daily rhythms were observed in the norepinephrine content of the rat hypothalamus (Manshardt and Wurtman, 1968) and also in the noradrenaline and histamine content in the caudate nucleus and mid-brain of the rat (Friedman and Walker, 1968).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This discrepancy could be due to different routes of administration, species differences in rates of metabolism, or species differences in pituitary responsiveness to these hormones. Another explanation is that AVP might cause release of endogenous CRF in addition to having a direct action on the pituitary (30). The subjects in the present study had no signs or symptoms of stress after AVP injection, so a nonspecific stress response appears to be an unlikely explanation for their IR-ACTH and IR-cortisol responses to AVP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%