2017
DOI: 10.14379/iodp.proc.364.105.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site M0077: Post-Impact Sedimentary Rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may indicate a less intense thermal alteration of shocked quartz during emplacement. The size of spherulitic calcite spheroids in subunit 4 is in a similar range to calcareous dinoflagellates, the latter of which are common at Cretaceous-Paleogene ejecta sites (e.g., Wendler and Willems, 2002) and are also observed at the base of the postimpact sedimentary section of IODP-ICDP Hole M0077A (Gulick et al, 2017b). The microstructure of the spherulitic calcite spheroids, however, is different from calcareous dinoflagellates and resembles the larger 250 µm carbonate melt spheroids in subunit 3 and the spheroidal calcite aggregates in accretionary lapilli.…”
Section: Subunitmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This may indicate a less intense thermal alteration of shocked quartz during emplacement. The size of spherulitic calcite spheroids in subunit 4 is in a similar range to calcareous dinoflagellates, the latter of which are common at Cretaceous-Paleogene ejecta sites (e.g., Wendler and Willems, 2002) and are also observed at the base of the postimpact sedimentary section of IODP-ICDP Hole M0077A (Gulick et al, 2017b). The microstructure of the spherulitic calcite spheroids, however, is different from calcareous dinoflagellates and resembles the larger 250 µm carbonate melt spheroids in subunit 3 and the spheroidal calcite aggregates in accretionary lapilli.…”
Section: Subunitmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Ages were then estimated for each sample assuming constant sedimentation rates within each biozone. Age estimates were not calculated for the top seven samples (609.74– 607.61 m below seafloor [mbsf]) due to uncertainty in the placement of the P3 biozone and the presence of a series of stacked unconformities at the top of the Paleocene (Gulick et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample collected at 503.6 m DSF is middle Eocene in age and indicative of a normal marine setting with bathyal water depths (~500-700 m). Semiquantitative abundance counts for this sample are included in Biostratigraphy in the Site M0077: Post-Impact Sedimentary Rocks chapter (Gulick et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Biostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%