2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site effect study in central Mexico using H/V and SSR techniques: Independence of seismic site effects on source characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A classification of the stations is also given to help future studies of attenuation parameters. Site effect results based on the type of shallow seismicity of this study are compared with results of previous studies (e.g., Singh et al, 2006Singh et al, , 2007Lozano et al, 2009;Castro and Ruíz-Cruz, 2005). These authors have reviewed only a few stations within or around the MVB based on in-slab seismicity and inter-plate seismicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A classification of the stations is also given to help future studies of attenuation parameters. Site effect results based on the type of shallow seismicity of this study are compared with results of previous studies (e.g., Singh et al, 2006Singh et al, , 2007Lozano et al, 2009;Castro and Ruíz-Cruz, 2005). These authors have reviewed only a few stations within or around the MVB based on in-slab seismicity and inter-plate seismicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Several studies have included stations within the MVB that have been classified as with NSA, but they did not use the seismicity source types analyzed in this paper (e.g., Singh et al, 2006Singh et al, , 2007Lozano et al, 2009;García et al, 2009), so currently there is no published study based on seismicity records within the MVB for sources also in the MVB. Even when there are seismic stations located within and around this region, which have been identified as having NSA (e.g., Castro and Ruíz-Cruz, 2005;Singh et al, 2006Singh et al, , 2007García et al, 2009;Lozano et al, 2009), it is necessary to compare the level of amplification of each station due to local sources to the values observed for regional sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest SNR cutoff value used is 2 (e.g., Borcherdt and Gibbs, 1976;Rogers et al, 1984;Darragh and Shakal, 1991;Satoh et al, 2001;Lozano et al, 2009). Most studies use the value of 3 (e.g., Field and Jacob, 1995;Theodulidis et al, 1996;Lachet et al, 1996;Bonilla et al, 1997Bonilla et al, , 2002Di Giacomo et al, 2005;Sawazaki et al, 2009).…”
Section: Signal-to-noise Ratio and Variance Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been debate on whether site effects are affected by source characteristics. Olsen (2000), Triantafyllidis et al (2002), and Parvez et al (2006) concluded that site effects depend not only on local soil characteristics but also on source characteristics based on fi nite difference methods or hybrid methods combining modal summation and fi nite difference, while Lozano et al (2009) found that the dependence of site effects on the source characteristics is negligible by using spectral ratio techniques. Therefore, the conclusions regarding the role of the source in site responses drawn from numerical and empirical methods are totally opposite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%