Site donneur de greffe de peau mince : quel pansement utiliser ?

Caliot, J.; Bodin, F.; Chiriac, S.; Correia, N.; Poli-Mérol, M.L.; François-Fiquet, C.

doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2014.09.006

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6,10 Despite the abundance of literature on wound dressings, no evidence is available on the superiority of one dressing to another using healing time as the primary outcome. 11 The most common complications and symptoms during the DSW healing period are pain, itching, infection, hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation, hypertrophic scarring, and donor site bleeding, all of which lead to delayed or impaired healing. 12,13 Pain at the DSW is frequently reported to be worse than the pain of the primary wound.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among others, fine mesh gauze impregnated with petrolatum, polyurethane semipermeable transparent films, hydrocolloids, and fiber-like calcium alginate are the most common 6,10 . Despite the abundance of literature on wound dressings, no evidence is available on the superiority of one dressing to another using healing time as the primary outcome 11 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Using an Elastomeric Skin Protectant to Manage Donor Site Wounds of Split-thickness Skin Grafts: A Case Series

Peters

Hanssens

Henau

et al. 2023

Adv Skin Wound Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a common surgical procedure to manage acute and chronic wounds. A plethora of dressings exists to treat STSG donor site wounds (DSWs). Recently, a new elastomeric skin protectant was adopted (Cavilon Advanced Skin Protectant; 3M) in the treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis. In this report, the authors assess the effects of this elastomeric skin protectant as an alternative wound dressing for STSG donor sites. The authors report a single-center prospective case series that was performed to establish a treatment protocol. Nine consecutive patients with different indications for treatment with an STSG from May to September 2018 were included. Collected data included general patient information, comorbidities, complications, blood loss, pain during dressing change, and the duration of DSW healing. This case series showed promising results in terms of duration of DSW healing when applying the elastomeric skin protectant. The authors also observed less blood loss and less pain during dressing changes. No infections were seen during the trial.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using an Elastomeric Skin Protectant to Manage Donor Site Wounds of Split-thickness Skin Grafts: A Case Series

Peters

Hanssens

Henau

et al. 2023

Adv Skin Wound Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SGDS that must be treated by re-epithelialization. The epithelialization takes 10-14 days to complete [7,8]. Various dressings have been suggested for managing these wounds [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Three Different Methods of Dressing for Skin Graft Donor Site

Aghdam

Alizadeh

Toomatari

et al. 2020

Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There are various methods to dress the Skin Graft Donor Site (SGDS), but some are very expensive and not available in Iran. This study aimed to compare three different dressings for the management of the SGDS.Methods: Ninety-six patients participated in the study, and they were randomly divided into three groups. Donor sites were dressed with one of these methods: Vaseline gauze or method A, mupirocin 2% or method B, and nitrofurazone or method C. In each method, the dressing layer was covered by 5 layers of dry gauze. The three groups were compared regarding the epithelialization time, infection, pain, and cost.Results: The epithelialization time was significantly longer in group A compared with groups B and C (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in infection and pain at rest, activity, and dressing time (P<0.05). There was a substantial difference between the three groups in the cost of dressing as method A was cheaper.Conclusion: Due to the lower cost of Vaseline gauze and no significant difference in infection, dressing adhesion to the skin, and amount of pain between three dressing methods, Vaseline gauze is a preferred method to skin graft donor site dressing.

show abstract

Les pansements des plaies superficielles

Perceau¹

2016

Soins

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Site donneur de greffe de peau mince : quel pansement utiliser ?

Cited by 6 publications

References 17 publications

Using an Elastomeric Skin Protectant to Manage Donor Site Wounds of Split-thickness Skin Grafts: A Case Series

Using an Elastomeric Skin Protectant to Manage Donor Site Wounds of Split-thickness Skin Grafts: A Case Series

Comparison of Three Different Methods of Dressing for Skin Graft Donor Site

Les pansements des plaies superficielles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About