2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-directed biotinylation of antibodies for controlled immobilization on solid surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increased Ab fragment density should theoretically result in enhanced detection sensitivity of the target antigen. Cho et al [3] experimentally confirmed this when an enhanced binding capacity was reported from an assay using Fab fragments compared to full Abs (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Recognition Elementssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This increased Ab fragment density should theoretically result in enhanced detection sensitivity of the target antigen. Cho et al [3] experimentally confirmed this when an enhanced binding capacity was reported from an assay using Fab fragments compared to full Abs (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Recognition Elementssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although highly stable, Abs covalently-linked through amino groups are randomly oriented with their antigen binding capacities reported as 2-3-fold lower compared to those of welloriented Abs [3,16]. Strategies available for the covalent site-specific oriented immobilisation of Abs exist using the carbohydrate chains of Abs for immobilisation [17].…”
Section: Fig (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The currently used techniques are in principle based on these studies and they have been applied to a variety of IgG molecules (Kato et al 1976, Karyakin et al 2000, Cho et al 2007, Pereira and Lai 2008, Cho et al 2009, Billah et al 2010, Ho et al 2010, Hu et al 2010, KausaiteMinkstimiene et al 2010, Wu et al 2014). Another of their advantages is that in cases when the amount of antibody is limited, it enables the reduction and/or conjugation procedures to be tested using other IgG antibodies at first.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is following the established protocol (Hermanson 2008) not taking the antibody type into consideration (Karyakin et al 2000, Billah et al 2010, Ho et al 2010, Hu et al 2010. The second one is tailoring the reduction conditions to particular antibodies resulting in many rather widely distributed adaptations of the original protocol (Kato et al 1976, Cho et al 2007, Pereira and Lai 2008, Kausaite-Minkstimiene et al 2010). Although it is sometimes implied that the reduction protocol has to be adapted for particular antibodies used, it is not clear how the reduction products differ when different antibodies are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%