2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-0996-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All depletion simulations are performed at an initial pressure of 24 MPa, at a constant temperature of 60°C, which represents a typical aquifer at an appropriate depth for CO 2 storage (Niemi et al., 2017). The ultimate pressure decline is set to 15 MPa for all simulations.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All depletion simulations are performed at an initial pressure of 24 MPa, at a constant temperature of 60°C, which represents a typical aquifer at an appropriate depth for CO 2 storage (Niemi et al., 2017). The ultimate pressure decline is set to 15 MPa for all simulations.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menurunnya indeks kualitas air di Yogyakarta Wong, Sungai Gadjah (Putro, 2017;Saraswati et al, 2019) juga dapat menjadi indikasi terjadinya pencemaran yang salah satu penyebab utamanya adalah pembuangan air limbah domestik tanpa diolah. Meskipun tidak menunjukkan relevansi secara langsung terhadap kondisi biotik di badan air, kadar COD dapat merepresentasikan tingginya pencemar organik di badan air (Niemi et al, 2006), sedangkan kadar nutrien yang tinggi di badan air dapat meningkatkan pertumbuhan fitoplankton yang dapat menyebabkan terjadinya algae bloom di perairan (Mahlil et al, 2018;Matthews, 2008) Dalam rangka pengendalian pencemaran air, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan mengesahkan Peraturan Kehutanan (LHK) Menteri LHK No. 68 tahun 2016 tentang baku mutu air limbah yang mengatur batasan maksimal konsentrasi pencemar yang diijinkan untuk dibuang ke lingkungan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…But the overall response of caprocks depends on the rock type. While certain caprocks undergo permeability increase due to interaction with CO 2 (Olabode and Radonjic, 2014), others present a self-sealing response to CO 2 flow due to porosity decrease (Espinoza and Santamarina, 2012) or fracture clogging (Noiriel et al, 2007). Nevertheless, CO 2 is only expected to penetrate a short distance, if any, into the caprock because of its high entry pressure, which prevents upwards CO 2 flow (Busch et al, 2008).…”
Section: Geochemical Effects On Geomechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%