2018
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8070242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Characterization by Dynamic In Situ and Laboratory Tests for Liquefaction Potential Evaluation during Emilia Romagna Earthquake

Abstract: To investigate the geotechnical soil properties of Emilia Romagna Region, a large series of in situ tests, laboratory tests and geophysical tests have been performed, particularly at the damaged city of Scortichino-Bondeno. Deep site investigations have been undertaken for the site characterization of the soil also along the Burana-Scortichino levee. Borings, Piezocone tests (CPTU) and dynamic in situ tests have been performed. Among them, Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves test (MASW) and Seismic Dilatome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first introduced by Hepton and then refined at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, USA. A new system with a seismic dilatometer has been recently developed in Italy [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Methodology and Interpretation Of Dilatometer Test (Dmt) Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first introduced by Hepton and then refined at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, USA. A new system with a seismic dilatometer has been recently developed in Italy [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Methodology and Interpretation Of Dilatometer Test (Dmt) Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noticeable difference between the density of the in situ material and the filling material of the pre-hole made the interpretation of the results particularly difficult. The combined knowledge of G o and of the one dimensional modulus M (from DMT) may be helpful in the construction of the G-γ modulus degradation curves [67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Soil Properties By In Situ Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most well-known effect is liquefaction. The geologic and hydrologic factors that affect liquefaction susceptibility are the age and the type of sedimentary deposits, the looseness of cohesion, and the depth to the groundwater table (Tinsley et al, 1985;Cavallaro et al, 2018). The liquefaction is mostly limited Table 3.…”
Section: B Determining Fuzzy Set and Fuzzification Of Thresholds Of mentioning
confidence: 99%