2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site application of biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) for slope surface protection: in-situ wet-spraying method and strengthening effect verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its cost-effectiveness, combinations of ST and other biopolymers are being investigated for use as soil binding materials 36 . For example, this study used corn ST, which has approximately 25% amylose, to prepare XG and ST compounds (XS) as strengthening materials for levee slope surfaces 9 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Because of its cost-effectiveness, combinations of ST and other biopolymers are being investigated for use as soil binding materials 36 . For example, this study used corn ST, which has approximately 25% amylose, to prepare XG and ST compounds (XS) as strengthening materials for levee slope surfaces 9 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the dried soil was uniformly mixed with the biopolymer solution at m w / m s (mass ratio of water to soil) = 25%, resulting in biopolymer to soil contents in mass ( m b / m s ) of 2% with an initial water content of 25%. This initial water content (i.e., water mixing ratio to soil) is the same for all biopolymer-treated soil samples in this study, based on previous research regarding the compaction test of KRS soil and a case study of field application for XS-treated soil 9 , 41 . In the same way, pure XG-treated soil samples were prepared at m b / m s of 1% and 2% for sand.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations