1996
DOI: 10.1515/nzst.1996.38.2.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sisyphus revisited. Reflections on the analogy between linguistic meaning and the meaning of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So our lives may have an objective meaning, but any objective meaning of our lives will leave us cold, 18 unless we appropriate it and thereby make it our own subjectively chosen first-person meaning. 19 This is rightly put forward by subjectivists. If someone declares that the meaning of human life is to serve God, I may shrug my shoulders indifferently and seek the meaning of my life in another perspective ; or I may embrace that objective meaning as my first-person meaning.…”
Section: Objective Meaning and Subjectively Given Meaningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…So our lives may have an objective meaning, but any objective meaning of our lives will leave us cold, 18 unless we appropriate it and thereby make it our own subjectively chosen first-person meaning. 19 This is rightly put forward by subjectivists. If someone declares that the meaning of human life is to serve God, I may shrug my shoulders indifferently and seek the meaning of my life in another perspective ; or I may embrace that objective meaning as my first-person meaning.…”
Section: Objective Meaning and Subjectively Given Meaningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A slightly different, but insightful, way of characterising the basic positions is offered by Sarot (). He distinguishes between externalism and internalism.…”
Section: The Question Of Life's Meaning: One or Many?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is the meaning of life one is interested in, it is still possible to hold that education can contribute to this, as long as one adheres to what Sarot () called ‘internalism’ with regard to the meaning of life (see Section ). According to Sarot, most theistic views are internalist as well; in other words, they are supernaturalist hybrid views, occupying a middle ground between supernaturalist objectivism and subjectivism.…”
Section: Relations Between Education and The Question(s) Of Life's Mementioning
confidence: 99%