1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1975.00311.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sisterhood‐Brotherhood is Powerful: Sibling Sub‐Systems and Family Therapy

Abstract: Sibling interaction is an often overlooked aspect of family functioning. Individual development and many family behavior patterns may be attributed to autonomous activities within the sibling sub‐system. A number of phenomena in which siblings have profound influence upon one another are explored. Siblings collude and align with each other, at times help each other resist the powerful vertical influences of parents. Other sibling systems serve to enmesh the youngsters even more with parents. Important sib‐beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This widened choice offered by a spread-out sibling network probably increased a woman's power to decide for herself what she would do. In general, migration processes in families would have intensified lateral ties among siblings at the expense of vertical family coordination, and would have set sibling subsystems (Bank and Kahn 1975) more clearly against parental authority, affecting the intra-household balance of power and the bargaining positions of family members. Moreover, because rural and urban destinations selected different types of migrants, they might also have had different implications for who would be involved in decision-making about migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This widened choice offered by a spread-out sibling network probably increased a woman's power to decide for herself what she would do. In general, migration processes in families would have intensified lateral ties among siblings at the expense of vertical family coordination, and would have set sibling subsystems (Bank and Kahn 1975) more clearly against parental authority, affecting the intra-household balance of power and the bargaining positions of family members. Moreover, because rural and urban destinations selected different types of migrants, they might also have had different implications for who would be involved in decision-making about migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that in the future, siblings may have to assume responsibility for the care of their aging parents as well as their brother or sister with retardation (Bank & Kahn, 1975;Goetting, 1986). Their willingness and capacity to expand their roles is unknown, but warrants considerable attention by program providers serving aging families with an adult dependent member.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they conclude that in disorganized families where parents relinquish executive functions, the unsatisfied needs of a child exert a pull that is responded to by siblings as a separate subsystem. Bank and Kahn (1975) have explored these issues further in their paper "Sisterhood-brotherhood is powerful." They indicate that minimal research has been done in this area, with sibling studies performed primarily in terms of birth order and sex and its influence on personality development.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the hypothesis that there is some quality or characteristic of the reorganizing family that led the diagnostician to lean in the direction of focusing on the sibling subgroup. The result of these treatment efforts provides interesting clinical evidence to complement the current literature (Bank & Kahn, 1975;Pollock, 1978), which suggests that the sibling group is a powerful and overlooked subsystem within families.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%