2002
DOI: 10.1080/026468302760270791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sister-to-sister gestational 'surrogacy' 13 years on: A narrative of parenthood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving to the potentially positive aspects of surrogacy, the work of Teman (2010) and the example provide by Kirkman (2002) indicate to us the fact that whilst in a large number of cases (and particular in the case of transnational surrogacy) the effects of commodification upon women's bodies may primarily be a product of normative discourses of femininity and the maternal, this may not always be the case. Teman suggests that for many women who act as surrogates, their ability to relinquish the child after birth is not because they are failed women or mercenary or because they steel themselves against the emotional and physical impact, but rather because they develop a bond with the woman for whom they carry the child (obviously in the cases where at least one of the commissioning parents is a woman).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moving to the potentially positive aspects of surrogacy, the work of Teman (2010) and the example provide by Kirkman (2002) indicate to us the fact that whilst in a large number of cases (and particular in the case of transnational surrogacy) the effects of commodification upon women's bodies may primarily be a product of normative discourses of femininity and the maternal, this may not always be the case. Teman suggests that for many women who act as surrogates, their ability to relinquish the child after birth is not because they are failed women or mercenary or because they steel themselves against the emotional and physical impact, but rather because they develop a bond with the woman for whom they carry the child (obviously in the cases where at least one of the commissioning parents is a woman).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps echoing the work of Gilligan (1982), then, this argument in support of surrogacy recognises that yes, surrogacy can only be undertaken by women, but this does not have to be because women are 'natural' mothers or only of worth if they fulfil the needs of others. Rather, examples such as that provided by Kirkman (2002) suggest that perhaps in some instances the 'trade' that two women may make for each other is not one of commodification, but rather one of a shared experience of living under patriarchy. Of course this suggestion sits somewhere on the slippery slope of essentialism about women and carework, and certainly our intention here is not to argue simplistically that women can easily undertake the role of surrogate and this be free of commodification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Catholic Church argues that techniques that entails the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple is gravely immoral. That surrogacy is an attempt to go beyond the limits of reasonable dominion over nature (Kirkman, 2010& Payne et al, 2020. Thus, the religious issue surroundings surrogacy is the question whether surrogacy is an alteration of God's ordained course of nature?…”
Section: Religious Perspective Of Surrogacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivering a baby for her sister may resolve the issue as to who is the real mother, genetic or gestational? Some authors established in their studies that being a surrogate motherhood for her sister is apparently more acceptable [39,53].…”
Section: Bakova/davcheva/mihaylova/petleshkova/dragusheva/tornyova/sementioning
confidence: 99%