Abstract:Resumo O presente texto discute como o direito de retificar o prenome e gênero nos documentos oficiais, assegurado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) para as pessoas transexuais e travestis, pode ficar comprometido quando os/as operadores/as do sistema de justiça exigem tecnologias de gênero que agudizam uma passabilidade pautada em performatividades de gênero binárias da/na cisgeneridade.
“…The described state of invisibility creates an ambiguity in the enforcement of rights for the transgender population (and LGB-TI+ community in general) by the Judiciary, as observed by Mario Gomes, Sara York, and Leandro Colling: "in constitutional actions with erga omnes effectiveness, the Judiciary demonstrates a progressive approach"; however, when handling cases involving the lived experiences of specific groups within this population, "the Judiciary tends to strip away the rights of those who do not conform to a binary and cisnormative gender expression at the individual level". The research demonstrates that the proximity of the member of the justice system to the transgender body is a fact that alters the way he/she interprets and applies rights, and this needs to be taken into account" (GOMES, YORK, COLLING, 2022, p. 1129.…”
Section: Transfeminist Theoretical and Method-ological Remarks 249mentioning
This book is the first outcome of the project "Rewriting Judgments from Feminist Perspectives in Brazil," which has been running since August 2021. The project has brought together a collaborative effort involving professors, researchers, and law students from various higher education institutions all over Brazil. What unites these people is their commitment and dedication to rewrite judgments handed down by Brazilian courts of different types of jurisdiction now through the lens of feminist and anti-racist legal theoretical approaches and methodologies. With five chapters dedicated to presenting the conceptual frameworks and the context analyses underlying the project, followed by 22 rewritten judgment, this book‘s aim is to broaden the understanding of and appreciation for the proposed approaches. It is our hope that this work will inspire students and professionals in the legal field to recognize the depth and intricacy of the perspectives presented herein and to acknowledge their relevance in the multitude of cases brought before court on a daily basis.
“…The described state of invisibility creates an ambiguity in the enforcement of rights for the transgender population (and LGB-TI+ community in general) by the Judiciary, as observed by Mario Gomes, Sara York, and Leandro Colling: "in constitutional actions with erga omnes effectiveness, the Judiciary demonstrates a progressive approach"; however, when handling cases involving the lived experiences of specific groups within this population, "the Judiciary tends to strip away the rights of those who do not conform to a binary and cisnormative gender expression at the individual level". The research demonstrates that the proximity of the member of the justice system to the transgender body is a fact that alters the way he/she interprets and applies rights, and this needs to be taken into account" (GOMES, YORK, COLLING, 2022, p. 1129.…”
Section: Transfeminist Theoretical and Method-ological Remarks 249mentioning
This book is the first outcome of the project "Rewriting Judgments from Feminist Perspectives in Brazil," which has been running since August 2021. The project has brought together a collaborative effort involving professors, researchers, and law students from various higher education institutions all over Brazil. What unites these people is their commitment and dedication to rewrite judgments handed down by Brazilian courts of different types of jurisdiction now through the lens of feminist and anti-racist legal theoretical approaches and methodologies. With five chapters dedicated to presenting the conceptual frameworks and the context analyses underlying the project, followed by 22 rewritten judgment, this book‘s aim is to broaden the understanding of and appreciation for the proposed approaches. It is our hope that this work will inspire students and professionals in the legal field to recognize the depth and intricacy of the perspectives presented herein and to acknowledge their relevance in the multitude of cases brought before court on a daily basis.
Resumo Objetivo Analisar o estigma evidenciado nas percepções de médicas e enfermeiras sobre o pré-natal de homens transexuais. Métodos Estudo qualitativo desenvolvido com nove profissionais de saúde (seis enfermeiras e três médicas) atuantes em Unidades de Saúde da Família em um município na Bahia. Foram realizadas entrevistas em profundidade, submetidas à Análise Temática Reflexiva e interpretação baseada na teoria do estigma e do conceito de cisheteronormatividade. Resultados Foram derivados dois temas que explicitaram o estabelecimento de rótulos e estereótipos ao corpo, mente e identidade de gênero do homem trans grávido: (des)preparo profissional e distanciamento das demandas e perspectivas cisheteronormativas para o cuidado pré-natal de homens trans. Elementos do estigma evidenciados: afastamento, rótulos, estereótipo, descrédito e discriminação. Tais elementos (percepções estigmatizantes) se manifestaram dentro da lógica da normalidade e equiparação cisgênero das necessidades de saúde dos homens trans no contexto pré-natal. Conclusão Há estigma na percepção de médicas e enfermeiras sobre o pré-natal de homens trans. A estigmatização pode impactar negativamente a qualidade do pré-natal e da saúde e segurança de homens trans no ciclo gravídico puerperal, antecipando pensamentos, atitudes e práticas que contribuem para a deteriorar a identidade transmasculina na gestação.
Objective To analyze the stigma evidenced in doctors’ and nurses’ perception regarding prenatal care for transgender men. Methods A qualitative study developed with nine health professionals (six nurses and three doctors) working in Family Health Units in a municipality in Bahia. In-depth interviews were carried out, subjected to reflective thematic analysis and interpretation based on the theory of social stigma and the concept of cisheteronormativity. Results Two topics were derived that explained the establishment of labels and stereotypes on the body, mind and gender identity of pregnant trans men: professional (un)preparedness and distancing from cisheteronormative demands and perspectives for prenatal care for trans men. Elements of stigma observed were distance, labels, stereotype, discredit and discrimination. Such elements (stigmatizing perceptions) manifested themselves within the logic of normality and cisgender equality of trans men’s health needs in the prenatal context. Conclusion There is stigma in doctors’ and nurses’ perception regarding prenatal care for trans men. Stigmatization can negatively impact the quality of prenatal care and trans men’s health and safety in the pregnancy and puerperal cycle, anticipating thoughts, attitudes and practices that contribute to the deterioration of transmasculine identity during pregnancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.