2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000181385.68835.a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sirolimus Use and De Novo Minimal Change Nephropathy Following Renal Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If a causal relationship does exist, the exact mechanism by which SRL may induce proteinuria remains speculative. Some studies implicate the induction of a specific glomerulopathy by SRL (19,21,22). However the majority of biopsied patients in our SRL group with proteinuria did not have a specific glomerular diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…If a causal relationship does exist, the exact mechanism by which SRL may induce proteinuria remains speculative. Some studies implicate the induction of a specific glomerulopathy by SRL (19,21,22). However the majority of biopsied patients in our SRL group with proteinuria did not have a specific glomerular diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A variety of glomerular findings associated with proteinuria have been attributed to sirolimus in the kidney transplantation setting, including MCD, FSGS, MN, MPGN, and IgA nephropathy. [96][97][98] Urinary protein loss presumably results from reduced tubular protein reabsorption. 99 A specific Glomerulus displaying changes of acute thrombotic microangiopathy with red blood cell congestion, intracapillary fibrin thrombi, and mesangiolysis.…”
Section: Calcineurin and Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient had been diagnosed with type I diabetes at the age of 43 and started hemodialysis for end-stage renal failure at the age of 54 without past history of nephrotic syndrome. The donor blood type was incompatible with that of the recipient (type AB to type B), and there were four mismatches in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -DR typing (donor: A 24, B 7, 52, DR 1, 15 to recipient: A 11,24,B 46,60,DR 9). At first, the patient received immunosuppressive therapy consisting of cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, rituximab and basiliximab.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%