2009
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sirolimus for treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Abstract: Acute GVHD (aGVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic allograft recipients. The best therapy for patients failing to respond, or not tolerating, systemic glucocorticoids remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy of sirolimus in 34 patients, median age of 49 (23-67) years, with steroid-refractory (n=31) or steroid-intolerant (n=3) aGVHD. aGVHD was diagnosed at a median of 34 (7-1042) days post allografting, and confirmed by biopsy in all cases. Initial aGVHD treatment consisted of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of 21 steroid-refractory grade III/ IV aGVHD patients, treatment with sirolimus was associated with responses in 57 % patients (CR 24 %), but treatment was discontinued in 10 patients due to no response in GVHD or toxicity [109]. Similar results were observed in retrospective studies as well [110]. It should be noted that in the GVHD prophylaxis study conducted by BMT-CTN which compared sirolimus/tacrolimus combination with methotrexate/tacrolimus combination, the option using busulfan/cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen in sirolimus/tacrolimus arm was closed due to excessive occurrence of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) [111].…”
Section: Sirolimussupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study of 21 steroid-refractory grade III/ IV aGVHD patients, treatment with sirolimus was associated with responses in 57 % patients (CR 24 %), but treatment was discontinued in 10 patients due to no response in GVHD or toxicity [109]. Similar results were observed in retrospective studies as well [110]. It should be noted that in the GVHD prophylaxis study conducted by BMT-CTN which compared sirolimus/tacrolimus combination with methotrexate/tacrolimus combination, the option using busulfan/cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen in sirolimus/tacrolimus arm was closed due to excessive occurrence of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) [111].…”
Section: Sirolimussupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Sirolimus is a mammalian-target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor which has been used in the treatment of steroidrefractory aGVHD as well as in GVHD prophylaxis studies [109,110]. Concerns have been raised over potential side effects of sirolimus which could include seizures, hyperlipidemia, thrombotic microangiopathy and myelosuppression.…”
Section: Sirolimusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial treatment remains the administration of systemic corticosteroids, which can achieve response rates of approximately 50% as reported in large registry studies, 1,2 with Ͻ 40% of patients maintaining a durable remission. 3,4 There is no standard secondline therapy for patients who do not respond to the initial treatment with steroids although many agents are used, including antithymocyte globulin (ATG), 5 sirolimus, 6 etanercept, 7 denileukin diftitox, 8 and mycophenolate mofetil. 9 Novel therapeutic approaches are needed, and the ideal therapy would be able to specifically suppress aGVHD without increasing a patient's susceptibility to opportunistic infections as well as maintaining an intact graft-versusmalignancy effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include antithymocyte globulin (ATG), 15 sirolimus, 16 etanercept, 17 denileukin diftitox, 18 extracorporeal pheresis, 19 mycophenolate mofetil, 20 mesenchymal stem cells, 21 and tocilizumab. 22 Most of these trials have been small single-arm studies and have generally shown historic response rates of ;30% and 6-month survival rates of around 40% to 45%, 4 which are comparable to the results observed in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%