2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000151260.74519.ca
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sirolimus-Eluting versus Bare Nitinol Stent for Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: The SIROCCO II Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
236
2
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
236
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal studies have provided strong proof of concept and several multicentre, randomized, controlled trials have shown a discernible difference in respect to vessel restenosis with all three strategies compared with standard old balloon angioplasty as described later [7][8][9][10]63]. On the other hand, laser and directional atherectomy have no proven benefit compared with standard balloon angioplasty and stenting [64,65].…”
Section: Procedural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal studies have provided strong proof of concept and several multicentre, randomized, controlled trials have shown a discernible difference in respect to vessel restenosis with all three strategies compared with standard old balloon angioplasty as described later [7][8][9][10]63]. On the other hand, laser and directional atherectomy have no proven benefit compared with standard balloon angioplasty and stenting [64,65].…”
Section: Procedural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 24 months, the restenosis rate was 22.9 and 21.1% in the sirolimus group and the control group, respectively (p > 0.05). In the SIROCCO II trial, 55 57 patients with chronic limb ischemia and FP occlusions or stenoses were randomized to the SMART control stent versus the SMART sirolimus-eluting stent. At 6 months, there was no restenosis seen in the sirolimuseluting stent group and 7.7% in the control group (p ¼ 0.49).…”
Section: Biological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Although the introduction of novel Nitinol stents decreased restenosis rates compared to plain balloon angioplasty (POBA), 7 restenosis still remains a significant problem in peripheral arteries. 6,8 In-stent restenosis occurs in up to 30% of the patients subsequent to bare metal Nitinol stent placement 6 and was reported to be associated with stent fractures 9,10 and arterial wall damage. 4,11 Stent failures are clearly associated with the forces exerted on the FPAS, which are caused by bending, torsion and axial motions during hip and knee flexion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%