1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Siphonophore Biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
147
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
4
147
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it was mainly found between 600 and 1500 m, with a mean depth, for the nectophores, of 753 m. There appears to be some latitudinal change in the depth distribution with the shallowest mean depth (480 m) being found between 10 and 15°N, and the deepest (905 m) between 25 and 30°N. These latitudinal depth changes appear to related to the prevailing hydrographical conditions (see Fasham and Angel, 1975;Mackie et al, 1987). F. vityazi appears, for the most part, to be confined to deeper South Atlantic Central Water (mixed with Antarctic Intermediate Water) and the boundary between this water mass and North Atlantic Central Water, to the north, may be acting as a barrier to its distribution.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, it was mainly found between 600 and 1500 m, with a mean depth, for the nectophores, of 753 m. There appears to be some latitudinal change in the depth distribution with the shallowest mean depth (480 m) being found between 10 and 15°N, and the deepest (905 m) between 25 and 30°N. These latitudinal depth changes appear to related to the prevailing hydrographical conditions (see Fasham and Angel, 1975;Mackie et al, 1987). F. vityazi appears, for the most part, to be confined to deeper South Atlantic Central Water (mixed with Antarctic Intermediate Water) and the boundary between this water mass and North Atlantic Central Water, to the north, may be acting as a barrier to its distribution.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nonetheless, there were no such similarities amongst the nectophores. Mackie et al (1987) also noted that the bract that Totton (1965, fig. 61) had illustrated under the heading Forskalia cuneata Chun, 1888 most probably belonged to F. vityazi; again establishing the apparent link with the family Forskaliidae.…”
Section: Frillagalma Vityazimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The majority of siphonophores are extremely fragile breaking into many pieces under the slightest of forces, thus restricting their distribution to oceanic environments where they do not come into contact with coastal hazards (currents, waves and hard substrates). There are some exceptions to this rule, for example Muggiaea atlantica (Cunningham, 1892) (and its 3 sibling species) are described as neritic, and are confined almost exclusively to near shore waters (MACKIE et al, 1987).…”
Section: Siphonophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a combination of active swimming and perhaps some buoyancy control, many siphonophores are capable of diel vertical migration, especially many epipelagic species (MACKIE et al, 1987). Therefore, although siphonophores are certainly consumed by leatherbacks (DAVENPORT & BALAZS, 1991), at times they may be too deep to be accessible to leatherbacks.…”
Section: Siphonophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siphonophores are complex colonial pelagic hydrozoans, most well known for their long gelatinous colonies that can exceed 30 m in length (Mackie et al, 1987;Robison, 2004). Over 60% of known siphonophore species, however, are small rocket-shaped colonies that rarely exceed 20 cm in total length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%