SIP1, a Novel Zinc Finger/Homeodomain Repressor, Interacts with Smad Proteins and Binds to 5′-CACCT Sequences in Candidate Target Genes

Abstract

Activation of transforming growth factor ␤ receptors causes the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Smad proteins, which then participate in the regulation of expression of target genes. We describe a novel Smad-interacting protein, SIP1, which was identified using the yeast two-hybrid system. Although SIP1 interacts with the MH2 domain of receptor-regulated Smads in yeast and in vitro, its interaction with full-length Smads in mammalian cells requires receptor-mediated Smad activation. SIP1 is a new member of the ␦EF1/ Zfh-1 family of two-handed zinc finger/homeodomain proteins. Like ␦EF1, SIP1 binds to 5-CACCT sequences in different promoters, including the Xenopus brachyury promoter. Overexpression of either full-length SIP1 or its C-terminal zinc finger cluster, which bind to the Xbra2 promoter in vitro, prevented expression of the endogenous Xbra gene in early Xenopus embryos. Therefore, SIP1, like ␦EF1, is likely to be a transcriptional repressor, which may be involved in the regulation of at least one immediate response gene for activin-dependent signal transduction pathways. The identification of this Smad-interacting protein opens new routes to investigate the mechanisms by which transforming growth factor ␤ members exert their effects on expression of target genes in responsive cells and in the vertebrate embryo.Ligands of the TGF-␤ 1 family exert their biological effects by activating serine/threonine kinase receptor complexes, which in turn activate intracellular mediators, the Smad proteins. Smads were initially identified by means of genetic studies in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans as Mad and Sma gene products, respectively. Nine different vertebrate Smads have been isolated (reviewed in Refs. 1-3; Ref. 4). These proteins are characterized by a three-domain structure containing conserved N-terminal and C-terminal domains, called the MH1 and MH2 domains, which flank a more variable, proline-rich linker region. The Smads can be classified into three subgroups based on their distinct functions. The receptor-regulated Smads (Smad1, 2, 3, 5, and 8) contain a conserved SSXS motif at their extreme C-terminal end. Upon ligand stimulation, two serines in this motif are directly phosphorylated by specific type I receptors. Once activated, these Smads associate with Smad4, a common mediator Smad, and the heteromeric complexes translocate to the nucleus where they mediate responses to specific ligands. Smads 1, 5, and 8 act in bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathways, whereas Smads 2 and 3 act in activin and TGF-␤ pathways. A third group of Smads, the inhibitory Smads (Smad6 and Smad7), prevent the activation of receptorregulated Smads or their heteromerization with Smad4. Functional homologues of inhibitory Smads and the common mediator Smad in Drosophila have been identified as Dad and Medea, respectively (1-3).In the absence of signaling, Smads are kept in a latent conformation through an intramolecular interaction between the MH1 and MH2 domains. Activation of receptor-regulated Smads has...

ZEB1‐regulated inflammatory phenotype in breast cancer cells

“…We also obtained ChIP‐seq data in MCF7 luminal‐type breast cancer cells. Data were obtained from TGF‐β‐treated cells based on the known functional interaction between Smad signaling and ZEB1 and ZEB2 (Postigo, 2003; Postigo et al ., 2003; Verschueren et al ., 1999). We identified 32 907 binding regions in MDA‐231‐D cells, 13 514 regions in Hs578T cells, and 281 regions in MCF7 cells that had q ‐values < 0.05.…”

Finding partners: How BMPs select their targets

“…Among the other DNA-binding Smad partners that have received attention are Zeb2 (also known as Sip1) and Zeb1 (also known as ␦EF1; Sekido et al, 1996;Verschueren et al, 1999). These closely related zinc finger proteins appear to form an inhibitor/activator pair and are orthologs of Drosophila zfh1 (Postigo, 2003;Postigo et al, 2003).…”

“…also function in regulating activin/nodal signaling (Verschueren et al, 1999). Smad1 protein has also been found to physically interact with HoxC8, Nkx3-2, YY1, ␤-catenin/Lef1 complex, and Gata factors 4, 5, and 6 (Shi et al, 1999;Kim and Lassar, 2003;Benchabane and Wrana, 2003;Brown et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2004;Hu and Rosenblum, 2005).…”

Sip1 regulates sequential fate decisions by feedback signaling from postmitotic neurons to progenitors

“…Sip1 is a DNA-binding transcriptional repressor that interacts with activated Smads, the transducers of TGFβ signaling 10 , and with the NuRD complex 11 . It also activates transcription on association with Smad8 (ref.…”