2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sintering induced the failure behavior of dense vertically crack and lamellar structured TBCs with equivalent thermal insulation performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the difference between the durability of the two types of TBCs depended on other factors in the absence of TGO thickness. It has been well documented that the sintering [11][12][13][14][15][58][59][60][61], gradient thermal cycling temperature [16][17][18][19], and roughness of bond coat/topcoat interface [7,[20][21][22][23] also affect the durability of samples. In this case, these other factors were all identical in these two types of TBCs, except for the microstructures of the bond coats.…”
Section: Thermal Cyclic Lifetime Of Tbcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the difference between the durability of the two types of TBCs depended on other factors in the absence of TGO thickness. It has been well documented that the sintering [11][12][13][14][15][58][59][60][61], gradient thermal cycling temperature [16][17][18][19], and roughness of bond coat/topcoat interface [7,[20][21][22][23] also affect the durability of samples. In this case, these other factors were all identical in these two types of TBCs, except for the microstructures of the bond coats.…”
Section: Thermal Cyclic Lifetime Of Tbcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely thought that both the phase transformation of the metastable T' phase and the sintering-induced stiffening of the top coating would contribute to the failure of a typical YSZ top coating. However, the phase transformation from T' phase to the M + C phases needs a long and even incubation period at a very high temperature [15][16][17]. In addition, the sintering induced stiffening should be significant to a sufficient level before spalling failure, and this would allow a very long service lifetime, even at high temperatures [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the geometry is asymmetrical, it leads to an antisymmetric stress distribution, resulting in an extra stress moment on one side and a higher stress on the other side in order to balance the stresses within the TC. Consequently, the highest tensile stress (grey part in Although the overall stresses within SPS TCs with VCs are much higher than that in the TBC without VCs, VC structured TCs nevertheless demonstrate longer lifetimes than that of APS TCs [140]. The rational for this phenomenon can be further analyzed as follows.…”
Section: Influences Of Tc Creep and Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…After the constraint is released and the in-plane stress reverts again to less than σs, sintering will continue [137]. For SPS TCs, the initial E* (146 GPa) is higher than APS TCs (usually << 100 GPa [138,139,140]), so the in-plane stress can build up quickly to hinder sintering; this also explains why VCs are easier to form in SPS TCs. In addition, during the first 800 h at the elevated temperature, the in-plane tensile stress is high enough to generate fresh VCs and to impede sintering.…”
Section: Sintering Resistance Of Sps Tcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation