2012
DOI: 10.1002/hed.23079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma: Molecular profile and therapeutic implications from a series of 32 cases

Abstract: This molecular fingerprint strongly argues against the clinical efficacy of BRAF-inhibitors, but could candidate primary sinonasal mucosal melanomas to therapeutic strategies targeting RAS and KIT mutations or inhibiting PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
92
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
8
92
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of the NRAS mutation according to tumor site was highest in the extremities (25%), followed by the face or scalp (18%) and trunk (18%) [55,61,63]. NRAS mutations have also been found in conjunctival melanomas (18% frequency) [63], sinonasal melanomas (22%) [65], esophageal melanomas (37.5%), including mutations in exon 1, which is a rare mutation site for cutaneous melanoma [66]. Interestingly, melanoma of unknown primary sites showed NRAS mutations in 32% of cases associated with high somatic mutation rates, high ratios of C>T/G>A transitions, and a 45% of BRAF mutations, collectively indicating a mutation profile consistent with cutaneous sun-exposed melanomas [67].…”
Section: Nras In Melanocytic Cell Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of the NRAS mutation according to tumor site was highest in the extremities (25%), followed by the face or scalp (18%) and trunk (18%) [55,61,63]. NRAS mutations have also been found in conjunctival melanomas (18% frequency) [63], sinonasal melanomas (22%) [65], esophageal melanomas (37.5%), including mutations in exon 1, which is a rare mutation site for cutaneous melanoma [66]. Interestingly, melanoma of unknown primary sites showed NRAS mutations in 32% of cases associated with high somatic mutation rates, high ratios of C>T/G>A transitions, and a 45% of BRAF mutations, collectively indicating a mutation profile consistent with cutaneous sun-exposed melanomas [67].…”
Section: Nras In Melanocytic Cell Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both mutations occur in a high percentage in cutaneous melanoma, mucosal melanomas have very low frequencies in BRAF mutation (4%) and higher in NRAS mutation (11%) 15 . Other studies confirmed the same finding which suggested that targeted treatments with selective BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib that were shown to improve overall and progression-free survival in cutaneous melanomas) are not of use in mucosal melanomas, especially in the head and neck site [34][35][36] . The new staging system according to the 8 th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 37 established a novel approach on T, N and M categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The atypical transformed melanocytes express abnormalities in the c-kit/stem cell factor pathway, in the endothelin receptor type B/endothelin pathway, and in the Wnt/ b-catenin pathway, and also show abnormal expression of cell-adhesion molecules [5,14,18,22,41,42]. Together, these molecular lesions selectively confer upon the atypical transformed melanocytes a competitive advantage in terms of their fitness and growth in relation to the neighbouring normal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%