2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1905.13194
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinkhorn Barycenters with Free Support via Frank-Wolfe Algorithm

Abstract: We present a novel algorithm to estimate the barycenter of arbitrary probability distributions with respect to the Sinkhorn divergence. Based on a Frank-Wolfe optimization strategy, our approach proceeds by populating the support of the barycenter incrementally, without requiring any pre-allocation. We consider discrete as well as continuous distributions, proving convergence rates of the proposed algorithm in both settings. Key elements of our analysis are a new result showing that the Sinkhorn divergence on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This yields a meta-framework which allows to employ fixed-support Wasserstein barycenter algorithms for fixed-support (p, C)-barycenter computation. One can also modify more general free support methods [Cuturi and Doucet, 2014, Ge et al, 2019, Luise et al, 2019, which usually alternate between updating the support set of the barycenter and its weights on this set, to provide approximate (p, C)-barycenters. However, the necessary position updates usually explicitly or implicitly rely on the fact that the barycentric application T J,p can be computed efficiently.…”
Section: Iterative Algorithms and The Multi-scale Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This yields a meta-framework which allows to employ fixed-support Wasserstein barycenter algorithms for fixed-support (p, C)-barycenter computation. One can also modify more general free support methods [Cuturi and Doucet, 2014, Ge et al, 2019, Luise et al, 2019, which usually alternate between updating the support set of the barycenter and its weights on this set, to provide approximate (p, C)-barycenters. However, the necessary position updates usually explicitly or implicitly rely on the fact that the barycentric application T J,p can be computed efficiently.…”
Section: Iterative Algorithms and The Multi-scale Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its exact computation requires the solution of a multimarginal OT problems [Carlier, 2003, Gangbo andSwiech, 1998], it has a polynomial complexity [Altschuler and Boix-Adsera, 2021] but does not scale to large input distributions. In low dimension, one can discretize the barycenter support and use standard solvers such as Frank-Wolfe methods [Luise et al, 2019], entropic regularization Doucet, 2014, Janati et al, 2020], interior point methods [Ge et al, 2019] and stochastic gradient descent [Li et al, 2015]. These approaches could be generalized to compute UOT barycenters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to choose the steepest descent direction in the admissible set. This approach was studied in Luise et al (2019) within the context of regularized optimal transport, where the regularized Wasserstein barycenter (also known as the Sinkhorn barycenter) minimizes a sum of Sinkhorn divergences. When the admissible set of directions forms a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) with suitable kernel, Shen et al (2020) propose to generate samples distributed according to the Sinkhorn barycenter by iterative pushforward of an initial measure with the map id R d − h • d, where h is a step size and d is the direction of steepest descent in the RKHS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%