Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-015-0778-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinkhole susceptibility mapping using logistic regression in Karapınar (Konya, Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our LR model performed similar to the models reported by Ciotoli et al . 24 for sinkhole susceptibility for Lazio Region in central Italy (AUC = 0.779) and by Ozdemir 76 for Karapinar region in Turkey (AUC = 0.814).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nevertheless, our LR model performed similar to the models reported by Ciotoli et al . 24 for sinkhole susceptibility for Lazio Region in central Italy (AUC = 0.779) and by Ozdemir 76 for Karapinar region in Turkey (AUC = 0.814).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is also a desert area in the southern parts of the region characterized by a low precipitation level, annual mean of 265 mm/yr (based on rain record from 1964–2015), which is the lowest in Turkey. Moreover, the evaporation in the region is generally higher than the precipitation [ 38 ]. The Karapinar area has been used for agricultural production for centuries, mostly by dry farming (non-irrigation).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantitatively evaluated and compared the efficiency of the models according to the area under the ROC curve (%). This technique has been applied to assess risk models of various hazards including subsidence [9], landslides [54], and sinkholes [55]; it is a standard method to quantitatively evaluate the quality of probabilistic and statistical models [56]. The x and y axes of the curve are sensitivity and specificity, respectively [56], and the area under the curve ranges from 0.5-1, with higher values indicating higher model accuracy and prediction capability.…”
Section: Model Evaluation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%