Sinister Aesthetics: The Appeal of Evil in Early Modern English Literature. Joel Elliot Slotkin. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. xii + 290 pp. $109.99.

Abstract

to extol the excellence of most chapters in part 2 and the collection as a whole. Even the few less successful pieces contain wonderful perceptions and are (like all but one or two) substantially responsive to other essays in the volume, enriching the collective pictures formed by the groupings of texts or travelers. Mary Fuller's afterword is a brilliant stroke of editorial care for the volume's contribution as a whole. Just as we start to hunger for meta-critical attention to the issue of the starved archive and the male-dominated literary canon, we hear from a scholar who combines, with a rare talent for both, fine training in literary and theoretical studies and wide experience in historiography. Her essay makes clear the paucity of resources, while providing a useful model for making the best possible use of what we have-even those of us with less ease of access to large research collections. More work needs to be done in the field staked out by this carefully crafted collection, and with the stimulating models it offers, and Fuller's attention to the process, it will be done.

The influence of entrepreneur’s innovation and entrepreneurship on modern art teaching model

“…Creativity is achieved through a deep understanding of art. Creation is the foundation of art colleges, and creative education is the vocation of art colleges ( Wadoski, 2020 ). In the final analysis, IEE in art colleges must return to “people.” Entrepreneurship education should realize the economic interests of “people-oriented,” “highlight” the “subject” of students, and show their “dignity” and “value” to serve the “harmonious development” of “high rationality” and “high emotion” ( Kurpayanidi, 2021 ).…”

“…Creativity is achieved through a deep understanding of art. Creation is the foundation of art colleges, and creative education is the vocation of art colleges (Wadoski, 2020). In the final analysis, IEE in art colleges must return to "people."…”