2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0145-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singularity Theory and Gravitational Lensing

Abstract: Singularity theory and gravitationallensing / Adie o. Petters, Harold Levine, Ioachim Wambsganss. p. cm.-(Progress in mathematical physics ; v 21) Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
440
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(450 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
440
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(28) in the approximation of weak and stationary fields. As a fundamental consequence, the lensing deflection angle will be given by the same formal expression found in general relativity (Schneider et al 1992;Petters et al 2001)…”
Section: Gravitational Lensingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(28) in the approximation of weak and stationary fields. As a fundamental consequence, the lensing deflection angle will be given by the same formal expression found in general relativity (Schneider et al 1992;Petters et al 2001)…”
Section: Gravitational Lensingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For an image pair in a fold configuration produced by any smooth lens potential, there is also a generic magnification relation, namely the 'fold relation' (Blandford & Narayan 1986;Schneider & Weiss 1992;Schneider, Ehlers & Falco 1992;Petters, Levine & Wambsganss 2001). In this paper, we take the form as in Keeton et al (2005):…”
Section: The Fold Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, a different mass tracer may be available for a subset of ETGs at intermediate redshift. Actually, gravitational lensing gives a strong constraint on the projected mass within the so called Einstein radius (Schneider et al 1992;Petters et al 2001). It is worth stressing that such an observational quantity is fully model independent although a galaxy model has to be assumed to extrapolate the results to other radii.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%