Let a morphism ƒ : X -• Y of algebraic varieties be given. A united set or united k-tuple 2 for ƒ is a fc-tuple x±,..., Xk of distinct points on (or "infinitely near") X, such that /(xi) = ••• = f(xk)> The purpose of this note is to announce an enumerative formula, valid under a restrictive hypothesis, for the united &-tuples of a map, i.e., a formula for the rational equivalence (or homology) class of a suitable cycle which parameterizes them. This yields as special cases formulas for the united /c-tuples which contain a fci-tuple, a /c2-tuple, etc. of mutually infinitely-near points. For our united-A>tuple cycle even to be defined, the morphism ƒ has to admit a certain kind of "resolution" (essentially it must factor through a "generic" map into a variety fibred by smooth curves over Y). Our result is sufficient, however, to yield formulas for the lines having prescribed contacts with a given projective variety having "generic" singularities and arbitrary dimension and codimension; these in turn yield formulas for the Thom-Boardman-Roberts singularity schemes [8] of a generic projection of such a variety. Classically such formulas were known for curves, for surfaces in P 3 , and in a few other cases, cf.[1]. Some recent results were obtained by Lascoux [6], Roberts [9] and LeBarz [7]. Our result yields new formulas even for surfaces in P 4 . For a modern account of these and related matters, see Kleiman's surveys [3, 5].Admittedly, the hypothesis of existence of a "resolution" is a severe restriction on the morphism ƒ. I am hopeful, however, that by pursuing further the same principles as in this paper, I will eventually obtain a united-set formula valid without such a restriction, and which would moreover be completely "intrinsic", in the sense of taking place on a suitable space associated solely to X (which is not the case with the present formula).We shall work in the category of complete (usually nonsingular) varieties over a field. Everything goes through with no change, however, in the category of compact complex manifolds.