1972
DOI: 10.1016/0040-9383(72)90022-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singularities of complex surfaces with solvable local fundamental group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next theorem answers a question of Wagreich [23]. It is practically, but not quite, a corollary of Theorem 3.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The next theorem answers a question of Wagreich [23]. It is practically, but not quite, a corollary of Theorem 3.…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, Tjurina's proof [11] that all rational double and triple points are taut implies that all rational double and triple embeddings of curves are formally ¿-rigid, while the nontaut examples of Brieskorn [3] and Wagreich [12] are non-¿-rigid.…”
Section: Versal Objects For [7j X ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction. Much progress has been made recently in the classification of normal singularities of complex analytic surfaces by considering their resolutions (see [3], [7], [11], [12], [13]). The present paper investigates deformations of formally embedded schemes with the aim of eventually using these objects in the algebraic category to classify singularities of dimension two and higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let /? be a singularity of a normal two-dimensional analytic space V. In [27] Wagreich introduced a definition for p to be weakly elliptic. Weakly elliptic singularities have occurred naturally in papers by Grauert [5], Hirzebruch [9], Laufer [19], Orlik and Wagreich [22], [23], Wagreich [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since TV/ is two dimensional and not compact, Wagreich [27] defined the singularity /? to be elliptic if x(^) > 0 f°r aL cycles D > 0 and x(^) = 0 for some cycles F > 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%