2021
DOI: 10.1112/s0010437x21007077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular units and isogenies between CM elliptic curves

Abstract: In this note, we will apply the results of Gross–Zagier, Gross–Kohnen–Zagier and their generalizations to give a short proof that the differences of singular moduli are not units. As a consequence, we obtain a result on isogenies between reductions of CM elliptic curves.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there are other applications of these expected results. For cases (2) and (3), by combining the analogue of Theorem 1.2 and the idea in [Li21b], we hope to obtain non-existence result of genus 2 curves with CM Jacobian and having everywhere good reduction in certain families, generalizing the main result in [HP17]. In the last case, we expect a variation of our construction to lead to a proof of the factorization conjecture of CM-values of twisted Borcherds product in [BY07].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, there are other applications of these expected results. For cases (2) and (3), by combining the analogue of Theorem 1.2 and the idea in [Li21b], we hope to obtain non-existence result of genus 2 curves with CM Jacobian and having everywhere good reduction in certain families, generalizing the main result in [HP17]. In the last case, we expect a variation of our construction to lead to a proof of the factorization conjecture of CM-values of twisted Borcherds product in [BY07].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…If d 1 d 2 is not a perfect square, this subgroup can be identified with Gal(H/E) with H the composite of the ring class fields H d j associated to the order of discriminant d j (see Prop. 3.2 in [13]). This observation and the above lemma give the following corollary.…”
Section: More Generally Assume γ ⊃ γ(M) Preserves L and Umentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This follows from the fact that differences of singular moduli are never units in the ring of algebraic integers, see [33,Corollary 1.3].…”
Section: Gcd's and Hilbert Class Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%