2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular spectrum analysis for an automated solvent artifact removal and baseline correction of 1D NMR spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). However, it is well know the disturbances that solvent suppression schemes promotes within vicinal frequencies and the increment of these artefacts when several signals are simultaneously suppressed [16]. Triple suppression Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). However, it is well know the disturbances that solvent suppression schemes promotes within vicinal frequencies and the increment of these artefacts when several signals are simultaneously suppressed [16]. Triple suppression Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software suites XWINNMR 2.6 and TOPSPIN 3.1 were used during the acquisition and the processing stages of the NMR data. SSA for solvent suppression and the ALS for baseline correction implemented in the program AUREMOL were applied to all spectra before performing the automated assignment to improve the spectral quality and reveal some resonances superposed by the solvent signal (Malloni et al, 2010;De Sanctis et al, 2011). The TALOS+ program (Corneliescu et al, 1999) was used to predict the secondary structure from the detected chemical shifts of C a , C b , C 0 , H a , and H N atoms yielding 4 and c dihedral angle restraints.…”
Section: Nmr Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSA also has been applied to process biomedical signals with different goals: eliminating high-amplitude artifacts [5], suppressing noise contributions or extracting informative components [22,8]. The elimination of high-amplitude artifacts is naturally related to the components associated with the largest eigenvalues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elimination of high-amplitude artifacts is naturally related to the components associated with the largest eigenvalues. Therefore, the number of eigenvalues is always discussed but in most of the applications eliminating the component related with the largest eigenvalue reduces significantly the artifact-related interference without distorting the underlying signal [5,23]. On the contrary, reducing white noise interferences usually is addressed by eliminating components related with small eigenvalues [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%