1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0977-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular Perturbation Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
430
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 520 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
430
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(This observation is important because the lower-order terms have already been determined correctly in the preceding applications.) We illustrate Theorem 3.1 with an example from the Michaelis-Menten-Henri mechanism of enzyme kinetics [4], [10], [26], [27], [28]. Similar results (for q = 1, 2) have been obtained by Valorani, Goussis, and Najm [33] for a model equation due to Davis and Skodje [3].…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 66%
“…(This observation is important because the lower-order terms have already been determined correctly in the preceding applications.) We illustrate Theorem 3.1 with an example from the Michaelis-Menten-Henri mechanism of enzyme kinetics [4], [10], [26], [27], [28]. Similar results (for q = 1, 2) have been obtained by Valorani, Goussis, and Najm [33] for a model equation due to Davis and Skodje [3].…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 66%
“…It offers a versatile alternative to classical perturbation methods, such as the Poincaré-Lindstedt method [26,34], the method of matched asymptotic expansions [15,18,25,39], the method of multiple time scales [15,18,29,39], the method of averaging [3,41], and the WKBJ method [35] which were each developed for specific types of problems. In numerous examples the results obtained using the RG method are shown to agree [5,6,30,37,49] with those obtained from classical methods.…”
Section: Relation Of This Analysis To Other Results About the Rg Methmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion for w, w (x,e) = w0 (x) + ewi (x) + e2 w2 (x) + ..., (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) implies that…”
Section: Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice that since expansion (4.11) is our hypothetical p, the outer expansion u must be contained in w when both written in terms of x = r]~1^. Consequently we should expect to find unknown ^ 's from Equations (4.16) while searching for unknown tjk s. The sequence of equations for tjk s has the following form (see Equations .., (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) with the successive equations containing other Aj's which enter the formulas for PjkS. At first glance, the task of finding Aj's and tjk s using Equations (4.19) seems to be daunting.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%