2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular linear statistics of the Laguerre unitary ensemble and Painlevé. III. Double scaling analysis

Abstract: We continue with the study of the Hankel determinant, defined by, D n (t, α) = det ∞ 0 x j+k w(x; t, α)dx n−1 j,k=0 , generated by a singularly perturbed Laguerre weight, w(x; t, α) = x α e −x e −t/x , x ∈ R + , α > 0, t > 0, obtained through a deformation of the Laguerre weight function, w(x; 0, α) = x α e −x , x ∈ R + , α > 0, via the multiplicative factor e −t/x . An earlier investigation was made on the finite n aspect of such determinants, which appeared in [20]. It was found that the logarithm of the Han… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark Let scriptĤfalse(ςfalse)=Hfalse(2ςfalse)α2/4, then scriptĤfalse(ςfalse) satisfies the Painlevé III σ‐form equation obtained by Ohyama–Kawamuko–Sakai–Okamoto, see (18) in, see also the Remark in . We note that and are the same as the double scaling limit of the Hankel determinant associated with the singularly perturbed Laguerre weight, see theorem in, the σ‐form Painlevé equation is equivalent to the second‐order eq.…”
Section: The Proofs Of Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark Let scriptĤfalse(ςfalse)=Hfalse(2ςfalse)α2/4, then scriptĤfalse(ςfalse) satisfies the Painlevé III σ‐form equation obtained by Ohyama–Kawamuko–Sakai–Okamoto, see (18) in, see also the Remark in . We note that and are the same as the double scaling limit of the Hankel determinant associated with the singularly perturbed Laguerre weight, see theorem in, the σ‐form Painlevé equation is equivalent to the second‐order eq.…”
Section: The Proofs Of Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Let( ) = (2 ) − 2 ∕4, then( ) satisfies the Painlevé III -form equation obtained by Ohyama-Kawamuko-Sakai-Okamoto, see (18) in, 30 see also the Remark 3 in. 31 We note that (34) and (36) are the same as the double scaling limit of the Hankel determinant associated with the singularly perturbed Laguerre weight, see theorem 1 in, 13 the -form Painlevé equation (35) is equivalent to the second-order eq. (30) in, 13 but the double scaling scheme and initial data ( , 0) are different from each other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [30]. The C potential (2.22) introduced in [9], after a change of variable, satisfies the above equation.…”
Section: An Equivalent Expression Readsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight w(x, α, t) = x α e −x−t/x was studied by Chen and Its [14] for finite n, Chen and Chen et al [8] for n → ∞.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%