2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singleton births after routine preimplantation genetic diagnosis using exclusion testing (D4S43 and D4S126) for Huntington’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6,11,[29][30][31][32] The mean age of woman at the beginning of the first cycle (31.3 years), as well as the delivery rates per OR (19.8% ) and per ET (24.8%), are similar to those for PGD for HD reported in the ESHRE PGD data collection X (mean age of woman: 32.0 years; delivery rate per OR: 19.8% and per ET: 23.6%). 30 The increased number of oocytes per cycle in Brussels compensated for the reduced number of embryos per ET in Brussels (single ET law since 2003), and did not result in an increased pregnancy rate.…”
Section: Pgd Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,6,11,[29][30][31][32] The mean age of woman at the beginning of the first cycle (31.3 years), as well as the delivery rates per OR (19.8% ) and per ET (24.8%), are similar to those for PGD for HD reported in the ESHRE PGD data collection X (mean age of woman: 32.0 years; delivery rate per OR: 19.8% and per ET: 23.6%). 30 The increased number of oocytes per cycle in Brussels compensated for the reduced number of embryos per ET in Brussels (single ET law since 2003), and did not result in an increased pregnancy rate.…”
Section: Pgd Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, the proportion of exclusion PGD was 33%, which is comparable to Brussels. 31,32 One might speculate that the increased interest in exclusion PGD in France is due to the relatively low uptake of presymptomatic testing for HD in France compared with Belgium and the Netherlands. 34 The position of the French Huntington Associations in favour of exclusion testing, coupled with counselling differences, may contribute to this difference.…”
Section: Reproductive Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described assay could be a helpful tool in those cases. Jasper et al [11] have developed a similar protocol for preimplantation diagnosis that provided couples with the opportunity to minimize the likelihood of disease transmission to their children, without the requirement for predictive testing. This strategy could be offered as a confirmatory tool in preimplantation field and as a pre-test to those couples afraid of the abortion risk of invasive prenatal techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the 13 panel markers, 6 have been previously reported and used successfully in PGD (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)19 ). The remaining 7 markers (HD2098407, HD2362117, HD2417179, HD3139793, HD3377975, HD3615631, and HD3829173), each possessing a PIC value Ͼ0.5, are novel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining markers, including 6 established/published markers (D4S3038, D4S43, D4S127, D4S126, I1CAHD, and D4S412) and 7 novel markers (HD2098407, HD2362117, HD2417179, HD3139793, HD3377975, HD3615631, and HD3829173), were optimized to coamplify in a multiplex panel. Although D4S3038 lies Ͼ1Mb upstream and furthest from the HTT CAG repeat, it was included in this marker screening because it was previously used in HD PGD (11,12,20 ); the remaining 12 markers all lay within 1 Mb of the HTT CAG repeat (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Cag Repeatmentioning
confidence: 99%