1996
DOI: 10.1080/00268979600100941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singlet-triplet energy gap in halogen-substituted carbenes and silylenes: a difference-dedicated configuration interaction calculation

Abstract: Ab initio calculations including correlation energy are reported on a series of halogen-substituted carbenes and silylenes: CH 2, CHF, CF 2, CHC1, CC12, CHBr, CBr2, Sill2, SiHF, SiF2, using the difference-dedicated configuration interaction method. All these compounds with the exception of CH 2 have singlet ground states. The singlet-triplet energy differences are in very good agreement with experiment when available, as well as with other high level calculations. The singlet-triplet separation is also determi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
68
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(61 reference statements)
11
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations predict a singlet ground state for both, with DE ST $ 20 kcal mol À1 ($7000 cm À1 ) for CCl 2 [19, and $17 kcal mol À1 ($5900 cm À1 ) for CBr 2 [30][31][32]34,35,[38][39][40]42,44,46,47]. In contrast, the photoelectron studies of Lineberger and coworkers [7,9] place the singlet-triplet splitting at 3(±3) kcal mol À1 for CCl 2 and 2(±3) kcal mol À1 for CBr 2 [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Calculations predict a singlet ground state for both, with DE ST $ 20 kcal mol À1 ($7000 cm À1 ) for CCl 2 [19, and $17 kcal mol À1 ($5900 cm À1 ) for CBr 2 [30][31][32]34,35,[38][39][40]42,44,46,47]. In contrast, the photoelectron studies of Lineberger and coworkers [7,9] place the singlet-triplet splitting at 3(±3) kcal mol À1 for CCl 2 and 2(±3) kcal mol À1 for CBr 2 [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In this case it is more difficult to decide what size the active space should be for the method to perform well at a moderate cost. For this reason, three different active spaces, (4,4), (8,8), and (12,12), were used to calculate the energies of the TS 1 and TS 2 structures on the ground-state surface. The results (Table 3) show that the oscillating convergence within the chemical precision limits, typical of this method, is reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank an anonymous referee for pointing out the existence of reference (16) and for making several other useful suggestions. This work was carried out under Contract DE-AC02-76CH00016 with the U. S. Department of Energy and supported by its Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%