1988
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(88)87025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singlet oxygen luminescence quantum yields in organic solvents and water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…μM counts counts to the value of Φ P =4.4×10 −3 obtained by Krasnovsky,14) and distinctly smaller than those of Φ P =1.8×10 −2 reported by Losev et al, 15) or Φ P =4.9×10 −2 obtained by Schmidt et al 16) However, in his first investigation, Krasnovsky determined the value of Φ P =5×10 −5 in CCl 4 from corrected emission spectra of the sensitizer protoporphyrin and 1 O 2 , 13) and later corrected his result to Φ P =4.4×10 −3 using tetraphenylporphine (TPP), which is more photochemically stable. The much lower value obtained in his first study can thus be explained by the poor photostability of the sensitizer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…μM counts counts to the value of Φ P =4.4×10 −3 obtained by Krasnovsky,14) and distinctly smaller than those of Φ P =1.8×10 −2 reported by Losev et al, 15) or Φ P =4.9×10 −2 obtained by Schmidt et al 16) However, in his first investigation, Krasnovsky determined the value of Φ P =5×10 −5 in CCl 4 from corrected emission spectra of the sensitizer protoporphyrin and 1 O 2 , 13) and later corrected his result to Φ P =4.4×10 −3 using tetraphenylporphine (TPP), which is more photochemically stable. The much lower value obtained in his first study can thus be explained by the poor photostability of the sensitizer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A large change in sensitivity can result in serious errors in corrections for emission spectra over the wide spectral range from 650 to 1270 nm. In the investigation by Losev et al, 15) their value of Φ P =1.8×10 −2 in CCl 4 was determined using LiNd phosphate glass with one of the emission bands at 1320 nm as a quantum yield standard. The quantum yield of the Nd glass, however, was only an estimate that was calculated from the luminescence lifetime and the known radiative lifetime of the glass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In H 2 O no emission was observed, which is due to the much lower solubility of oxygen in water than in organic solvents 42 and very low quantum yield of singlet oxygen emission ( ϕ ~ 10 -7 ). 43 In water, singlet oxygen emission is efficiently quenched by OH vibrations as well as by the emission re-absorption by the OH vibrational overtone. 44,45 As a result, the lifetime of singlet oxygen in water is very short, only 3.5 μ s. 46 On the other hand, in D 2 O the lifetime is significantly longer, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has provided a means of directly monitoring the generation and reactivity of 02(lAg). The large amount of data covering many various sensitizer and substrate molecules has allowed some conclusions to be drawn on basic questions such as the solvent dependency of the lifetime of 02('A,) (Merkel and Kearns, 1972;Hurst and Schuster, 1983;Rodgers, 1983;Schmidt and Brauer, 1987;Lin et al, 1988;Schmidt, 1989), the radiative lifetime of O,( lag) (Krasnovsky, 1981;Gorman et al, 1987;Scurlock and Ogilby, 1987;Losev et al, 1988;Schmidt et al, 1989;Schmidt and Afshari, 1990;Gorman et al, 1991), the parameters which determine the efficiency of 02(IAg) generation by sensitizers (Redmond and Braslavsky, 1988b), and the reactivity of substrates with this highly oxidative excited species (see Gorman and Rodgers, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%