2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b07362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singlet Fission and Excimer Formation in Disordered Solids of Alkyl-Substituted 1,3-Diphenylisobenzofurans

Abstract: We describe the preparation and excited state dynamics of three alkyl derivatives of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (1) in both solutions and thin films. The substitutions are intended to disrupt the slip-stacked packing observed in crystals of 1 while maintaining the favorable energies of singlet and triplet for singlet fission (SF). All substitutions result in films that are largely amorphous as judged by the absence of strong X-ray diffraction peaks. The films of 1 carrying a methyl in the para position of one p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 34 A large matrix element coupling the parent singlet exciton and nascent triplet pair is often considered desirable for highly efficient singlet fission, and it is expected that maximizing this matrix element correspondingly maximizes triplet pair yields. We note that although several factors could potentially complicate a direct interpretation of the results in terms of the intrinsic timescale of triplet pair formation, including the concentration of singlet fission sites in the amorphous nanoparticles and singlet diffusion to them, 20 , 32 , 61 qualitative arguments can be made such that our interpretation regarding coupling strengths relevant to the initial step of singlet fission still holds (Section S7 † ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 34 A large matrix element coupling the parent singlet exciton and nascent triplet pair is often considered desirable for highly efficient singlet fission, and it is expected that maximizing this matrix element correspondingly maximizes triplet pair yields. We note that although several factors could potentially complicate a direct interpretation of the results in terms of the intrinsic timescale of triplet pair formation, including the concentration of singlet fission sites in the amorphous nanoparticles and singlet diffusion to them, 20 , 32 , 61 qualitative arguments can be made such that our interpretation regarding coupling strengths relevant to the initial step of singlet fission still holds (Section S7 † ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 66 , 68 , 89 While differences between experiment and theory remain, the studies above could be unified by considering a more fundamental view where losses can be explained by considering how molecular packing influences the extent to which the constituent triplets act independently, either through ground-state intermolecular packing geometries 9 , 66 or through those introduced via excited-state processes such as excimer relaxation. 61 , 68 , 90 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower yield of triplets further supports the notion of the excimer as a trap state rather than a facilitator of triplet formation, which is consistent with our prior work on engineered films of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran. 57 The small but nonzero triplet yield in 2a is not surprising given the likelihood of small crystalline domains not detectable by XRD that produce triplets with yields similar to the 2á or 2â forms.…”
Section: Prediction Of Better Packing Geometries the Formation Of Exmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The presence of excimer formation pathways has previously been implicated as deleterious in endothermic SF situations. 57,58 Excimer formation is less likely at low temperature, which is evident from the structured fluorescence and the slowing of the CT decay, from which at least a portion of the excimers arise ( Figure S7). The CT yield can be determined with the aid of the known radical cation extinction coefficients ( Figure S8) to be roughly 20% for 2a, 30% for 2á and 40% for 2â at room temperature.…”
Section: Prediction Of Better Packing Geometries the Formation Of Exmentioning
confidence: 99%