2020
DOI: 10.1364/boe.401591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single wavelength measurements of absorption coefficients based on iso-pathlength point

Abstract: In optical sensing, to reveal the chemical composition of tissues, the main challenge is isolating absorption from scattering. Most techniques use multiple wavelengths, which adds an error due to the optical pathlength differences. We suggest using a unique measurement angle for cylindrical tissues, the iso-pathlength (IPL) point, which depends on tissue geometry only (specifically the effective radius). We present a method for absorption assessment from a single wavelength a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample's extinction coefficient, µ, i.e., the sum of the absorption coefficient, µ a , and the scattering coefficient, µ s , can be a priori known via an independent experimental method such as absorption spectroscopy or collimated transmittance spectroscopy. This type of independent extinction coefficient measurement has been reported earlier for pure water [21], various emulsions [22], bioliquids [23], oils [24] and semiconductors [25]; typically, the relative error, σ µ = δµ/µ, in the measurement of the extinction coefficient is of 0.1% to 10% [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Main Conceptsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The sample's extinction coefficient, µ, i.e., the sum of the absorption coefficient, µ a , and the scattering coefficient, µ s , can be a priori known via an independent experimental method such as absorption spectroscopy or collimated transmittance spectroscopy. This type of independent extinction coefficient measurement has been reported earlier for pure water [21], various emulsions [22], bioliquids [23], oils [24] and semiconductors [25]; typically, the relative error, σ µ = δµ/µ, in the measurement of the extinction coefficient is of 0.1% to 10% [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Main Conceptsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…11,16 In a previous study, it was possible to isolate the absorption coefficient from the light intensity even when the scattering was unknown. 15 This was due to the correction for the Beer−Lambert law with the IPL separation of the scattering from the absorption. According to the modified Beer−Lambert law:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the absorption coefficient is changed but the scattering is unchanged, the IPL point will not appear . This implies that the IPL point allows for the separation of scattering and absorption; changes in absorption do not affect the position of the IPL point, only attenuating its intensity. , Therefore, in order to accurately determine the position of the IPL point, the absorption coefficient must be kept constant, requiring careful sample preparation . It is also important to know the sample diameter because the position of the IPL point is proportional to the optical depth, which is accounted for both by the sample diameter and the distance between the detector and the sample. , In a previous study, it was possible to isolate the absorption coefficient from the light intensity even when the scattering was unknown .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, absorption does not change the position of this point; it only attenuates the intensity [24]. It is therefore the optimal point for absorption measurements since it minimizes changes in optical pathlength [25]. Despite the fact that theoretical and numerical simulations are highly agreed, a consistent difference exists over experimental results [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%