1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02049936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single vs. double stapling technique in colorectal surgery

Abstract: Seventy patients after rectosigmoid resection were randomized to a rectal anastomosis either in the single or double stapling technique. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. A trend in favor of the double stapling technique was noted: 2.8 percent clinical leaks vs. 8.6 percent in the single stapling technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identical complications have been reported after SST and conventional DST, both with and without colostomy. 17,18 Thus, comparatively few complications occurred after IO-DST, without any mortality, in the present study. Local recurrence after conventional DST was reported in 4 (9.3%) of 43 patients by Griffen et al 12 and in 15 (9.1%) of 166 patients by Laxamana et al 16 The local recurrence rate after IO-DST of 6.7% was similar to that after conventional DST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Identical complications have been reported after SST and conventional DST, both with and without colostomy. 17,18 Thus, comparatively few complications occurred after IO-DST, without any mortality, in the present study. Local recurrence after conventional DST was reported in 4 (9.3%) of 43 patients by Griffen et al 12 and in 15 (9.1%) of 166 patients by Laxamana et al 16 The local recurrence rate after IO-DST of 6.7% was similar to that after conventional DST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Only one randomised prospective study has compared DS with conventional manual purse-string [7]. The difference between the two, in the small series of 70 patients, did not reach statistical significance, but a clear trend was apparent toward less leakage after DS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Pelvic abscess is usually the result of an anastomotic leak. Even though there have been few studies which have directly compared the anastomotic complication rate between the two groups, the reported anastomotic complication rates in the colo-anal anastomosis group range from 9.7% to 20% [70,72,74,76,83,86,88], and from 1.2% to 10.5% [1,6,8,56,90,91] in the colonic J-pouch group, showing a trend towards superiority in the latter setting. Hallbook and Sjodahl [74] reported a randomized trial comparing coloanal anastomosis to colonic J-pouch.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 84%