2013
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02947-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Tube Multiplexed Molecular Detection of Endemic Porcine Viruses in Combination with Background Screening for Transboundary Diseases

Abstract: Detection of several pathogens with multiplexed real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays in a one-step setup allows the simultaneous detection of two endemic porcine and four different selected transboundary viruses. Reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR systems for the detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), two of the most economically important pathogens of swine worldwide, were combined with a screening system for diseases notifiable to the W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous report has described a mRT-qPCR for the simultaneous detection of ASFV, CSFV, FMDV, Suid herpesvirus 1 (pseudorabies; SuHV-1), PRRSV, and PCV-2. 25 Unlike the 4-plex RT-qPCR described herein, the mRT-qPCR from the previous study was not evaluated using OF samples and utilizes the same reporter dye for ASFV, CSFV, FMDV, and SuHV-1 detection, such that positive amplification reported by the dye requires follow-up with 4 single-target RT-qPCR assays for confirmatory diagnosis. 25 The goal of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the feasibility of OF sampling from pigs infected with ASFV, CSFV, or FMDV and to develop a single test for their detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous report has described a mRT-qPCR for the simultaneous detection of ASFV, CSFV, FMDV, Suid herpesvirus 1 (pseudorabies; SuHV-1), PRRSV, and PCV-2. 25 Unlike the 4-plex RT-qPCR described herein, the mRT-qPCR from the previous study was not evaluated using OF samples and utilizes the same reporter dye for ASFV, CSFV, FMDV, and SuHV-1 detection, such that positive amplification reported by the dye requires follow-up with 4 single-target RT-qPCR assays for confirmatory diagnosis. 25 The goal of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the feasibility of OF sampling from pigs infected with ASFV, CSFV, or FMDV and to develop a single test for their detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Unlike the 4-plex RT-qPCR described herein, the mRT-qPCR from the previous study was not evaluated using OF samples and utilizes the same reporter dye for ASFV, CSFV, FMDV, and SuHV-1 detection, such that positive amplification reported by the dye requires follow-up with 4 single-target RT-qPCR assays for confirmatory diagnosis. 25 The goal of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the feasibility of OF sampling from pigs infected with ASFV, CSFV, or FMDV and to develop a single test for their detection. In keeping with the 3 Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) of institutional animal care and use guidelines, this study sought to reduce the number of animals required by leveraging demonstration studies for foreign animal disease infections used to educate veterinary pathologists and diagnosticians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex, gel-based PCR assays for detection of CSFV and ASFV [10], [11] and RT-PCR assays for singleplex CSFV [11][18] or ASFV detection [19][21] have been described. However, to date, a multiplex real-time RT-PCR for simultaneous detection of CSFV and/or ASFV has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One or more viruses can infect swine and cause the same syndrome such as reproductive and/or respiratory failure and high fever. As far as the authors knows, mPCR has been used to detect ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV and PRV infections of swine in a single reaction before (Wernike et al 2013), but the authors could not distinguish HP-PRRSV and PRRSV. In this study, we developed and evaluated a multiplex PCR for not only simultaneous detection of nucleic acid from four viruses: CSFV, ASFV, PRRSV, PRV, but also differentiated HP-PRRSV and PRRSV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%