2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-trial-based temporal principal component analysis on extracting event-related potentials of interest for an individual subject

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One further way to mitigate issues of statistical power is by turning to contemporary single-subject ERP analyses. There are now numerous methods available for single-subject analyses of ERP data (Amin et al, 2023; Kallionpää et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2023), but the basic objective is to treat the effect size of the difference between two conditions (e.g., viewing faces vs. houses) in an individual as the dependent measure of interest before comparing this metric across groups (e.g., ADHD vs. neurotypical). Doing so cuts down on extraneous statistical noise and can result in higher statistical power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One further way to mitigate issues of statistical power is by turning to contemporary single-subject ERP analyses. There are now numerous methods available for single-subject analyses of ERP data (Amin et al, 2023; Kallionpää et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2023), but the basic objective is to treat the effect size of the difference between two conditions (e.g., viewing faces vs. houses) in an individual as the dependent measure of interest before comparing this metric across groups (e.g., ADHD vs. neurotypical). Doing so cuts down on extraneous statistical noise and can result in higher statistical power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature on visual object classification based on single-trial ERP, many studies have focused on extracting specific ERP components, combining the use of ERP components, and extracting features from the whole ERP signals, such as using the component of P2, P3, and N1/ N170. For instance, Zhang, et al [13] have proposed a temporal principal component analysis-based method for N2 and P2 components extraction in single-trial for individual subjects. It also explored the influence of the number of trials (from 10 to 42 trials), on PCA decomposition by comparing temporal correlation, and spatial correlation with conventional time-domain analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is often in conflict with the real ERP waveform or topography, as individuals sometimes show substantial variance either in temporal or spatial characteristics of activation. Therefore, to overcome this problem, some advanced methods from this class of solutions attempt to extract the temporal and spatial features of ERPs of interest from single-trial EEG or individual subjects (Cong et al, 2010;Huster et al, 2020;Rissling et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core challenge for the methods mentioned above was that the latency and phase of individual trials varied to some extent. To extract these variables of ERPs among subjects, temporal-PCA has been used to extract ERP components of interest from single trials EEG epochs of an individual and found that the number of PCs related to a specific ERP component varied across subjects (Zhang et al, 2023). These findings, in turn, reveal that the latency and phase actually vary across subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%