2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipin.2015.7346965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single transceiver device-free indoor localization using ultrasound body reflections and walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output feature 3 y is then passed into softmax output layer. According to Formula (5), we calculate the posterior probability During the process of floor recognition, the user's floor is the same as the floor with the maximum probability.…”
Section: Online Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The output feature 3 y is then passed into softmax output layer. According to Formula (5), we calculate the posterior probability During the process of floor recognition, the user's floor is the same as the floor with the maximum probability.…”
Section: Online Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) play an important role in outdoor navigation due to their positioning ability, but their use is limited in indoor environments because the signal is blocked by houses and the inhabitants inside. In order to satisfy the needs of indoor location-based services (LBS), such as ultrasound [3], ultra-wideband [4], geomagnetic fields [5], images [6], light [7], inertia systems [8] and wireless signals [9] are used for indoor positioning. As infrastructure for widely deployed public networks, Wi-Fi access point (AP) networking hardware devices are now found in nearly every indoor area where people conduct their daily activities, which provides a huge application space for indoor location services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many indoor localization methods have been proposed in academia as well as in industry. Typical indoor localization methods like Wi-Fi [4][5][6][7][8][9], Bluetooth [10], ultrasound (US) [11], infrared (IR) [12], radio frequency identification (RFID) [13,14], magnetic field (MF) [15], and ultra-wideband (UWB) [16] methods, have been investigated. Indoor positioning systems estimate the location by using different types of measurements, such as angle of arrival (AOA), time of arrival (TOA), time difference of arrival (TDOA), and received signal strength (RSS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on specific technology, it is possible to categorize methodologies for smartphone-based indoor pedestrian self-positioning systems into two distinct groups: (1) infrastructure-based systems that use auxiliary equipment or a cooperation between nodes to realize target tracking [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], and (2) the infrastructure-free systems that realize pedestrian self-positioning using only the information provided by the smartphone carried on one’s person [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. However, when using the former, the pedestrian is likely to experience difficulties in position acquisition when the cooperative information is unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%