2021
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2020.3015354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Timescale Distributed GNE Seeking for Aggregative Games Over Networks via Forward–Backward Operator Splitting

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of NE seeking algorithms, for the partial-decision information setting, have been proposed, e.g. [10]- [11]. However, all these results require strict/strong monotonicity of the pseudo-gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of NE seeking algorithms, for the partial-decision information setting, have been proposed, e.g. [10]- [11]. However, all these results require strict/strong monotonicity of the pseudo-gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, A : R n ⇒ R n and B : R n → R n are a set valued and a single valued monotone operator, respectively. Inclusions as the above arise systematically in convex optimization [5,19,35,90] and generalized Nash equilibrium problems in convex-monotone games [11,14,21,107,108,109].…”
Section: Applications Of Convergent Deterministic Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [18] design a continuous-time algorithm based on the projected dynamics and non-smooth tracking strategy, which is only applicable if the coupling constraints can be expressed as a system of linear equations. More recently, [19], [20] introduce local estimates of the aggregates of interest, and then leverage the forwardbackward splitting and proximal-point algorithms to compute the GNEs, respectively. The authors of [21] further develop an algorithm that can deal with time-varying communication networks by integrating the projected pseudo-gradient scheme with dynamic tracking.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, 𝜆 𝑖 is the Lagrange multiplier enforcing the resource constraints 𝐴 𝑖 𝑥 𝑖 + 𝜎 𝑖 ≤ 𝑐; 𝑑 𝑖 is the multiplier enforcing the correct aggregate estimation, i.e., 𝜎 𝑖 = 𝑗 ∈N −𝑖 𝐴 𝑗 𝑥 𝑗 . Notably, besides the explicit local problem formulation of agent 𝑖 in (4), the decision vector 𝑥 𝑖 is also involved in the constraints 𝜎 𝑗 = 𝑝 ∈N − 𝑗 𝐴 𝑝 𝑥 𝑝 for all 𝑗 ∈ N −𝑖 , and that is why we need to incorporate 𝑗 ∈N −𝑖 (−𝐴 𝑇 𝑖 𝑑 𝑗 ) into the first inclusion of(19).We assume that for each agent 𝑖 ∈ N , its local optimization problem(4) admits a minimizer 𝑥 * 𝑖 . Let 𝑥 * [𝑥 * 𝑖 ] 𝑖 ∈N .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%